Meta-analysis of Chinese business cycle correlation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fidrmuc, Jarko
dc.contributor.author Korhonen, Iikka
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-11T11:07:47Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-11T11:07:47Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/handle/123456789/16018
dc.description.abstract We review previous research on China's business cycle correlation with other economies applying meta‐analysis. We survey 71 papers analysing the different periods of Chinese economic development since the 1950s that were published in English or Chinese. We confirm that Pacific Rim economies in particular have relatively high business cycle correlation with China. It appears that many characteristics of the studies and authors influence the reported degree of business cycle synchronization. For instance, Chinese‐language papers report higher correlation coefficients. Despite this, we do not detect robust evidence for publication bias in the papers. Moreover, we show that the broad evidence does not confirm the popular decoupling hypothesis.
dc.language.iso ENG
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.subject suhdanteet
dc.subject Kiina
dc.subject Aasia
dc.subject.other China
dc.subject.other business cycle synchronization
dc.subject.other meta-analysis
dc.title Meta-analysis of Chinese business cycle correlation
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:bof-201901111028
dc.subject.jel E32
dc.subject.jel F34
dc.series.name Pacific Economic Review
dc.series.volume 23
dc.series.number 3
dc.date.publication 3.8.2018
dc.subject.yso suhdannevaihtelut
dc.subject.yso synkronointi
dc.description.publication Published in BOFIT Discussion Papers 6/2015.
dc.type.okm A1
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12173
dc.format.pagerange 385-410

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record