To convey the severity of ambient air pollution level to the public, air quality index (AQI) is used as a communication tool to reflect the concentrations of individual pollutants on a common scale. However, due to the enhanced air pollution control in recent years, air quality has improved, and the roles of some air pollutant species included in the existing AQI as urban air pollutants have diminished. In this study, we suggest the current AQI should be revised in a way that new air pollution indicators would be considered so that it would better represent the health effects caused by local combustion processes from traffic and residential burning. Based on the air quality data of 2017-2019 in three different sites in Helsinki metropolitan area, we assumed the statistical distributions of the current indicators (NO2 and PM2.5) and the proposed particulate indicators (BC, LDSA and PNC) were related as they have similar sources in urban regions despite the varying correlations between the current and proposed indicators (NO2: r = 0.5-0.85, PM2.5: r = 0.28-0.72). By fitting the data to an optimal distribution function, together with expert opinions, we improved the current Finnish AQI and determined the AQI breakpoints for the proposed indicators where this robust statistical approach is transferrable to other cities. The addition of the three proposed indicators to the current AQI would decrease the number of good air quality hours in all three environments (largest decrease in urban traffic site, similar to 22 %). The deterioration of air quality class appeared more severe during peak hours in the urban traffic site due to vehicular emission and evenings in the detached housing site where domestic wood combustion often takes place. The introduction of the AQI breakpoints of the three new indicators serve as a first step of improving the current AQI before further air quality guideline levels are updated.

Can mitigating only particle mass, as the existing air quality measures do, ultimately lead to reduction in ultrafine particles (UFP)? The aim of this study was to provide a broader urban perspective on the relationship between UFP, measured in terms of particle number concentration (PNC) and PM2.5 (mass concentration of particles with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mu m) and factors that influence their concentrations. Hourly average PNC and PM2.5 were acquired from 10 cities located in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia over a 12-month period. A pairwise comparison of the mean difference and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the application of bootstrapping were performed for each city. Diurnal and seasonal trends were obtained using a generalized additive model (GAM). The particle number to mass concentration ratios and the Pearson's correlation coefficient were calculated to elucidate the nature of the relationship between these two metrics. Results show that the annual mean concentrations ranged from 8.0 x 10 3 to 19.5 x 10(3) particles.cm(-3) and from 7.0 to 65.8 mu g.m(-3) for PNC and PM2.5, respectively, with the data distributions generally skewed to the right, and with a wider spread for PNC. PNC showed a more distinct diurnal trend compared with PM2.5, attributed to the high contributions of UFP from vehicular emissions to PNC. The variation in both PNC and PM2.5 due to seasonality is linked to the cities' geographical location and features. Clustering the cities based on annual median concentrations of both PNC and PM2.5 demonstrated that a high PNC level does not lead to a high PM2.5, and vice versa. The particle number-to-mass ratio (in units of 10(9) particles.mu g(-1)) ranged from 0.14 to 2.2, > 1 for roadside sites and <1 for urban background sites with lower values for more polluted cities. The Pearson's r ranged from 0.09 to 0.64 for the log-transformed data, indicating generally poor linear correlation between PNC and PM2.5. Therefore, PNC and PM2.5 measurements are not representative of each other; and regulating PM2.5 does little to reduce PNC. This highlights the need to establish regulatory approaches and control measures to address the impacts of elevated UFP concentrations, especially in urban areas, considering their potential health risks.