Opening academic publishing - Development and application of systematic evaluation criteria

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Hanken School of Economics, Information Systems Science, Helsinki en
dc.contributor.author Björk, Anna
dc.contributor.author Paavola, Juho-Matti
dc.contributor.author Ropponen, Teemu
dc.contributor.author Laakso, Mikael
dc.contributor.author Lahti, Leo
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-27T07:03:02Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-27T07:03:02Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Björk , A , Paavola , J-M , Ropponen , T , Laakso , M & Lahti , L 2018 , Opening academic publishing - Development and application of systematic evaluation criteria . Open Science and Research Initiative . en
dc.identifier.other PURE: 8620450
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: ba89ab21-bdc6-4082-a834-4231714a06dd
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0003-3951-7990/work/47747518
dc.description.abstract This report summarizes the development of a standardized scorecard for evaluating the openness of academic publishers. The assessment was completed in January 2018 as part of the Open Science and Research Initiative of the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. The project complements the previous reports published by the Open Science and Research Initiative and the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture, which have covered (i) the openness of universities and polytechnics, (ii) the overall situation of OA publishing costs in Finland, and (iii) research organization and research funding organizations, including selected European research funders. The project mapped and evaluated the openness of selected major academic publishers: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), American Chemical Society (ACS), Elsevier, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (IEEE), Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins (LWW), Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley-Blackwell. The dimensions of publisher openness were summarized in a scorecard of seven key factors, providing a new tool for systematic and standardized evaluation. We used data from the publisher websites to compare the key factors of openness, and the publishers were given a chance to provide comments on the collected information. As complementary sources, we utilized data from commonly acknowledged, open databases: Directory of OA Journals (DOAJ), Gold OA Journals 2011-2016 (GOAJ2), Scopus (title list +Scimago), and Sherpa / Romeo. The main results include the scorecard and the evaluation of openness of the selected major academic publishers. These are based on seven key factors: (i) Fraction of open access (OA) journals and their articles of the total publication output, (ii) costs of OA publishing (article processing charges, APC), (iii) use of Creative Commons (CC) licensing, (iv) self-archiving policies, (v) access to text and data mining (TDM), (vi) openness of citation data, and (vii) accessibility of information relating to OA practices. To take a look beyond the publisher level into journal level practices we also sampled individual journals. We use the samples to discuss the distribution of journals according to APCs, their licensing and three impact metrics (CiteScore 2016, Scimago Journal & Country Ranks (SJR) 2016, and Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016). The evaluation of the selected publishers with the scorecard indicates, for example, that the fraction of OA journals and their articles of the total publication output runs low within this group. In our sample of journals, the most expensive OA journals also seem to bear the highest impact metrics. A definite view on the matter, however, would require more extensive data and further research. We conclude by discussing key aspects and complexities in quantitative evaluation and in the design of a standardized assessment of publisher openness, and note also further factors that could be included in future versions of the scorecard. en
dc.format.extent 41
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Open Science and Research Initiative
dc.relation.uri https://openscience.fi/opening-academic-publishing
dc.rights en
dc.subject 113 Computer and information sciences en
dc.subject KOTA2018 en
dc.subject 1 - Open access publication channel en
dc.subject 1 - Self archived en
dc.subject 0- Ingen av författarna har en utländsk affiliation en
dc.subject 0- Publicerad i Finland en
dc.subject 1- Minst en av författarna är affilierad vid ett företag en
dc.title Opening academic publishing - Development and application of systematic evaluation criteria en
dc.type Commissioned report
dc.type.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.contributor.pbl

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
OPENING_ACADEMIC_PUBLISHING.pdf 1.373Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record