Client-orientated collaboration of youth psychiatry and its network partners : The method used was focus group interviews of professionals

Show simple item record

dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Policy en
dc.contributor Helsingin yliopisto, Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta, Yhteiskuntapolitiikan laitos fi
dc.contributor Helsingfors universitet, Statsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Samhällspolitiska institutionen sv
dc.contributor.author Sellergren, Hanna
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-08T09:31:58Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-08T09:31:58Z
dc.date.issued 2007-10-26
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/10771
dc.description Endast sammandrag. Inbundna avhandlingar kan sökas i Helka-databasen (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Elektroniska kopior av avhandlingar finns antingen öppet på nätet eller endast tillgängliga i bibliotekets avhandlingsterminaler. sv
dc.description Only abstract. Paper copies of master’s theses are listed in the Helka database (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Electronic copies of master’s theses are either available as open access or only on thesis terminals in the Helsinki University Library. en
dc.description Vain tiivistelmä. Sidottujen gradujen saatavuuden voit tarkistaa Helka-tietokannasta (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Digitaaliset gradut voivat olla luettavissa avoimesti verkossa tai rajoitetusti kirjaston opinnäytekioskeilla. fi
dc.description.abstract The research subject of my licentiate thesis is collaboration, carried out by youth psychiatry and its network partners working with a same client/family. My research question is how the workers describe and conceive collaboration.The central concepts are collaboration, network work, expertise and multiprofessionalism. All concepts have connections with each other but they also form conceptspairs which are co-operation - network work and multiprofessionalism - expertise. Each mainconcept is divided into subconcepts as follows: collaboration: coordination, cooperation and communication network work: institutional and dialogical network work multiprofessionalism: (sector central) multiprofessionalism and interprofessionalism expertise: modern and postmodern expertise The first level (subconcept) of each main concept is the required base on which the next level has been developed. For each subconcept a new way develops to collaborate, do network work and multiprofessional work and carry out expertise. The research is qualitative. The empirical data is collected from four network groups which have collaborated respectively with four families. The professionals represent youth psychiatry, child protection and pupil welfare. The research methodology is constructionism and fenomenography. Focus groups were used as interview method. The interviews were concentrated on the collaboration of the network with a particular family, and questions related to collaboration on a more common and broad level. In order to get a holistic picture about the collaboration it was essential that actual examples of collaboration could be observed. The networks would now speak of their experiences regarding the collaboration they had carried out. The point of view of my research is that of the client-orientated professionals, and the results show their experiences of questions regarding the collaboration. The research reveals information about which level the workers choose or fall to collaborate on, how work carried out in networks work out between separate organizations and also what kind of challenges shared work between organizations brings, how multiprofessionalism is understood, on what level it is carried out and what kind of expertise different organizations and occupational groups are bringing. With continued collaboration situations alter, and the means of collaboration changed.When problems emerged, solutions were sought from coordination of how the work was distributed. In discussions about the collaboration between organisations, questions regarding responsibilities, and the flow of information linked to professional discretion were central. Interprofessionalism was formed especially between those parteners who were used to working together. Modern expertise was more common among the professionals of youth psychiatry whereas professionals of child protection represented postmodern expertice. On account of my data, I find, that in the client-orientated collaboration between youth psychiatry, child protection and pupil welfare the situations were often very complicated. Due to the complicity of the situations, it could be established, that communication rather than coordination, dialogical rather than institutional network work, interprofessional rather than multiprofessional work and postmodern rather than modern expertise were needed. en
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject collaboration en
dc.subject social networks en
dc.subject multi-professionalism en
dc.subject expertise en
dc.subject focus groups en
dc.title Client-orientated collaboration of youth psychiatry and its network partners : The method used was focus group interviews of professionals en
dc.identifier.laitoskoodi 7051
dc.type.ontasot Licentiate thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Lisensiaatintyö fi
dc.type.ontasot Licentiatsavhandling sv
dc.type.dcmitype Text
dc.subject.discipline Social Work en
dc.subject.discipline Sosiaalityö fi
dc.subject.discipline Socialt arbete sv
dc.format.content abstractOnly

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
abstract.pdf 49.12Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record