Yliopiston etusivulle Suomeksi På svenska In English Helsingin yliopisto

The accession negotiatiations on agriculture between Poland and the EU as an example of two - level game model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Helsingin yliopisto, Yleisen valtio-opin laitos fi
dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Department of Political Science en
dc.contributor Helsingfors universitet, Allmän statslära, Institutionen för sv
dc.contributor.author Czajka, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-08T10:00:58Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-08T10:00:58Z
dc.date.issued 2003-13-10 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/12794
dc.description Endast avhandlingens sammandrag. Pappersexemplaret av hela avhandlingen finns för läsesalsbruk i Statsvetenskapliga biblioteket (Unionsgatan 35). Dessa avhandlingar fjärrutlånas endast som microfiche. sv
dc.description Abstract only. The paper copy of the whole thesis is available for reading room use at the Library of Social Sciences (Unioninkatu 35) . Microfiche copies of these theses are available for interlibrary loans. en
dc.description Vain tiivistelmä. Opinnäytteiden sidotut arkistokappaleet ovat luettavissa HY:n keskustakampuksen valtiotieteiden kirjastossa (Unioninkatu 35). Opinnäytteitä lainataan ainoastaan mikrokortteina kirjaston kaukopalvelun välityksellä fi
dc.description.abstract The aim of this thesis is to describe and understand international bargaining process between Poland and the European Union (EU) over the issue of direct payments, which is one of mechanisms of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The research had been conducted within the two-level game model according to which the negotiatior has to addrres the two imperatives at the same time, domestic and international. The methodological principle of research on international negotiations is to multiply the number of observations within the analyzed case what allow for the reliable scientific testing. Methodologically, level games seem to solve the level – of analysis problem by taking into account both domestic and international variables to explain outcomes. Nevertheless within the model were applied the factors of comparative analysis and discourse analysis. The results obtained: 1. Two-level game becames difficult when applied to the EU because of its structural complexity. The EU does not speak with the one voice while conducting accession negotiations. 2. The internal division of domestic faction can be both creative and destructive. 3. The state can gain strenght out of weakness by picturing to the opposing side the growing costs of domestic 'no-agreement'. 4. The role of the Commisssion during the accession negotiations was recognized as passive. 5. The most profound negotiation tools are: linkage issue, side-payments,package deals and tradeoffs. The most significant startegies: 'tight hands', 'take it or leave it', yielding, contending and problem-solving. The tools stated above had the biggest impact on the course of negotiations. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Euroopan unioni - maatalous - Puola en
dc.subject vertaileva tutkimus en
dc.subject diskurssi - tutkimus en
dc.subject Puola - maatalous - neuvottelu en
dc.subject EU - agriculture - Poland en
dc.subject comparative studies en
dc.subject discourse - studies en
dc.subject Poland - agriculture - negotiations en
dc.title The accession negotiatiations on agriculture between Poland and the EU as an example of two - level game model en
dc.identifier.laitoskoodi 711 en
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu fi
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu sv

Files in this item

Files Description Size Format View/Open
abstract.pdf 49.81Kb PDF View/Open
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Helda


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account