Scouting polyphony in late ancient Christianity : an overview of different conceptualisations of otherness based on the juxtaposition of institutional and non-institutional voices

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201506031318
Julkaisun nimi: Scouting polyphony in late ancient Christianity : an overview of different conceptualisations of otherness based on the juxtaposition of institutional and non-institutional voices
Tekijä: Huerta Jiménez, Diego Alonso
Muu tekijä: Helsingin yliopisto, Teologinen tiedekunta
University of Helsinki, Faculty of Theology
Helsingfors universitet, Teologiska fakulteten
Julkaisija: Helsingfors universitet
Päiväys: 2015
Kieli: eng
URI: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201506031318
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/155497
Opinnäytteen taso: pro gradu -tutkielmat
Oppiaine: The Religious Roots of Europe
The Religious Roots of Europe
The Religious Roots of Europe
Tiivistelmä: The purpose of this thesis is to problematize the complexity and the variety of voices that dialogued by the end of the third century a.D. in Rome in order to contribute to shape the phenomenon we have come to know as Christianity. The research question is:as opposed to using just a source associated with the Church, what additional perspectives are provided by the juxtaposition of more voices in order to conceptualise alterity within Christianity in this foundational moment? In order to answer it, I use three sources (Eusebius’ Historia Ecclesiastica, Lactantius’ De Mortibus Persecutorum and the Memoria Apostolorum graffiti in Via Appia, Rome), which provide a variety of voices associated with a range social actors. The objective is to give a broader account of Christian alterity in late antiquity by means of applying a dialogic approach. Originally proposed by Mikhail Bakhtin, this hermeneutic paradigm seeks to juxtapose the voices of all the social actors implied in order to show the conflict between. Given that it would not be possible to juxtapose all the possible sources, I base my analysis in a historical framework grounded on secondary literature that also acts as a metadiscursive context to interpret the sources. I make use of mixed methods based on content analysis, using MaxQDA to code segments in all three sources and then analyse their frequencies in order to delineate which variables are more relevant to analyse. I thereafter present comments; first analysing only Eusebius’ text, then analysing all three together and showing the conflict between them. Finally, I contrast both conceptualisations. My main conclusion is that an open ended account of history represents alterity in a more complex way that allows researchers to make folk discourses visible, as was the case for these three sources, despite having the risk of being more chaotic.
Avainsanat: poststructuralism
folk
vernacular
popular
dialogism
polyphony
alterity
otherness
Christianity
late
antiquity
ancient
heresy
discourse
tradition
memory
politics
power


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
[HUERTA, Diego] ... e ancient Christianity.pdf 1.015MB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot