Scouting polyphony in late ancient Christianity : an overview of different conceptualisations of otherness based on the juxtaposition of institutional and non-institutional voices
Show simple item record
dc.contributor |
Helsingin yliopisto, Teologinen tiedekunta |
fi |
dc.contributor |
University of Helsinki, Faculty of Theology |
en |
dc.contributor |
Helsingfors universitet, Teologiska fakulteten |
sv |
dc.contributor.author |
Huerta Jiménez, Diego Alonso |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201506031318 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/155497 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The purpose of this thesis is to problematize the complexity and the variety of voices that dialogued by the end of the third century a.D. in Rome in order to contribute to shape the phenomenon we have come to know as Christianity. The research question is:as opposed to using just a source associated with the Church, what additional perspectives are provided by the juxtaposition of more voices in order to conceptualise alterity within Christianity in this foundational moment? In order to answer it, I use three sources (Eusebius’ Historia Ecclesiastica, Lactantius’ De Mortibus Persecutorum and the Memoria Apostolorum graffiti in Via Appia, Rome), which provide a variety of voices associated with a range social actors. The objective is to give a broader account of Christian alterity in late antiquity by means of applying a dialogic approach. Originally proposed by Mikhail Bakhtin, this hermeneutic paradigm seeks to juxtapose the voices of all the social actors implied in order to show the conflict between. Given that it would not be possible to juxtapose all the possible sources, I base my analysis in a historical framework grounded on secondary literature that also acts as a metadiscursive context to interpret the sources.
I make use of mixed methods based on content analysis, using MaxQDA to code segments in all three sources and then analyse their frequencies in order to delineate which variables are more relevant to analyse. I thereafter present comments; first analysing only Eusebius’ text, then analysing all three together and showing the conflict between them. Finally, I contrast both conceptualisations. My main conclusion is that an open ended account of history represents alterity in a more complex way that allows researchers to make folk discourses visible, as was the case for these three sources, despite having the risk of being more chaotic. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Helsingfors universitet |
sv |
dc.publisher |
University of Helsinki |
en |
dc.publisher |
Helsingin yliopisto |
fi |
dc.subject |
poststructuralism |
en |
dc.subject |
folk |
en |
dc.subject |
vernacular |
en |
dc.subject |
popular |
en |
dc.subject |
dialogism |
en |
dc.subject |
polyphony |
en |
dc.subject |
alterity |
en |
dc.subject |
otherness |
en |
dc.subject |
Christianity |
en |
dc.subject |
late |
en |
dc.subject |
antiquity |
en |
dc.subject |
ancient |
en |
dc.subject |
heresy |
en |
dc.subject |
discourse |
en |
dc.subject |
tradition |
en |
dc.subject |
memory |
en |
dc.subject |
politics |
en |
dc.subject |
power |
en |
dc.title |
Scouting polyphony in late ancient Christianity : an overview of different conceptualisations of otherness based on the juxtaposition of institutional and non-institutional voices |
en |
dc.type.ontasot |
pro gradu-avhandlingar |
sv |
dc.type.ontasot |
pro gradu -tutkielmat |
fi |
dc.type.ontasot |
master's thesis |
en |
dc.subject.discipline |
The Religious Roots of Europe |
en |
dc.subject.discipline |
The Religious Roots of Europe |
fi |
dc.subject.discipline |
The Religious Roots of Europe |
sv |
dct.identifier.urn |
URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201506031318 |
|
Files in this item
Total number of downloads: Loading...
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Show simple item record