CMC and social information processing in a work context : a qualitative approach

Show simple item record

dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Studies en
dc.contributor Helsingin yliopisto, Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta, Sosiaalitieteiden laitos fi
dc.contributor Helsingfors universitet, Statsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för socialvetenskaper sv
dc.contributor.author Lindqvist, Antti
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-18T09:09:26Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-18T09:09:26Z
dc.date.issued 2010-03-18T09:09:26Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/16080
dc.description Endast sammandrag. Inbundna avhandlingar kan sökas i Helka-databasen (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Elektroniska kopior av avhandlingar finns antingen öppet på nätet eller endast tillgängliga i bibliotekets avhandlingsterminaler. sv
dc.description Only abstract. Paper copies of master’s theses are listed in the Helka database (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Electronic copies of master’s theses are either available as open access or only on thesis terminals in the Helsinki University Library. en
dc.description Vain tiivistelmä. Sidottujen gradujen saatavuuden voit tarkistaa Helka-tietokannasta (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Digitaaliset gradut voivat olla luettavissa avoimesti verkossa tai rajoitetusti kirjaston opinnäytekioskeilla. fi
dc.description.abstract The topic of this research is Computer-Mediated Communication, electronic mail (e-mail) communication more precisely. This research has multiple purposes. Firstly this research represents an empirical and qualitative verification of the Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT) in an organizational context. Proposed by Walther at the beginning of the 1990s, the SIPT was a counter strike aimed at research from the 1980s which suggested that because of a lack of non-verbal cues, email, was unsuited to interpersonal communication, leading to anti-social and task-oriented communication. This research, then, contradicts this earlier view of email communication. The second focus, or purpose, of this research was on the non-verbal cues used in email communication to form impressions of email partners as well as on the use of non-verbal cues to send impressions. This central facet of the SIPT has thus far been understudied in academic literature. Thirdly, the current research aimed to shed light on the use of supplementary sources of information in impression formation. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews. Six employees of a large Finnish multinational firm were all interviewed twice. The employees represent an international team with members in three different countries, who communicate primarily by email. The interviews were structured around the Social Information Processing Theory so that the different components of the theory were all discussed in the interviews. The transcribed interview data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis, the process which, was structured around the cues used to form impressions. Relevant cases in the data were identified and classified until meaningful categories emerged. The main results of the current research are twofold. Firstly the research verified the robustness of the Social Information Processing Theory to model email communication in an organizational context. The SIPT was developed with social communication in mind, but it is also able to describe the process of impression formation in a work environment. Secondly the results of the current research demonstrate the central role of contextual or inferential non-verbal cues in impression formation. The communicators studied in this research all share the same organizational context, which has a profound impact on the cues used to form impressions. Whereas previous research has concentrated primarily on more concrete cues (such as the use of smileys), the results of the current research are an important step in elaborating the SIPT specifically with regard to contextual non-verbal cues. References Walther, J. (1992) Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction- A Relational Perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90. Walther, J. & Parks, M. (2002). Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered in: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships. Walther, J. & Tidwell, L. (1995). Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication, and the Effect of Chronemics on Relational Communication. Culnan, M. & Markus, M. (1987). Information Technologies Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Tyler, J. & Tang, J. (2003). When can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage.
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Computer-mediated Communication en
dc.subject Social Information Processing Theory en
dc.subject Qualitative Content Analysis en
dc.subject tietokonevälitteinen viestintä fi
dc.title CMC and social information processing in a work context : a qualitative approach en
dc.date.updated 2010-02-02T08:36:35Z
dc.identifier.laitoskoodi H720
dc.type.ontasot master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot pro gradu -tutkielmat fi
dc.type.ontasot pro gradu-avhandlingar sv
dc.type.dcmitype Text fi
dc.subject.discipline Social Psychology en
dc.subject.discipline Sosiaalipsykologia fi
dc.subject.discipline Socialpsykologi sv
dc.format.content abstractOnly

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
abstract-eng.pdf 4.659Kb PDF View/Open
abstract-fin.pdf 4.675Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record