A constructivist analysis of the U.S. Rogue State policy in towards Iran

Show simple item record

dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science en
dc.contributor Helsingin yliopisto, Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta, Yleisen valtio-opin laitos fi
dc.contributor Helsingfors universitet, Statsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Institutionen för allmän statslära sv
dc.contributor.author Morgan, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-04T13:24:52Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-04T13:24:52Z
dc.date.issued 2009-05-11
dc.identifier.other valttiivi:2009-189 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/16373
dc.description Endast sammandrag. Inbundna avhandlingar kan sökas i Helka-databasen (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Elektroniska kopior av avhandlingar finns antingen öppet på nätet eller endast tillgängliga i bibliotekets avhandlingsterminaler. sv
dc.description Only abstract. Paper copies of master’s theses are listed in the Helka database (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Electronic copies of master’s theses are either available as open access or only on thesis terminals in the Helsinki University Library. en
dc.description Vain tiivistelmä. Sidottujen gradujen saatavuuden voit tarkistaa Helka-tietokannasta (http://www.helsinki.fi/helka). Digitaaliset gradut voivat olla luettavissa avoimesti verkossa tai rajoitetusti kirjaston opinnäytekioskeilla. fi
dc.description.abstract The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have been locked in a war of words, exchanging insults and threats since the Islamic Revolution of 1979 and the ensuing hostage crisis in the American embassy in Tehran. Iran, along with North Korea, is currently one of the two states singled out as "rogue states" by the US government. This thesis deals with the relations between the United States of America and Iran between 1953 and 2009. It probes the deep history of friendship and enmity between the two states and analyses them using Constructivist theory, based on the writings of Alexander Wendt, notably his article "Anarchy Is What States Make Of It" and his book "Social Theory of International Politics". What results is an explanation of why the United States has regarded the Islamic Republic of Iran as a a "rogue state". Its findings show that what can be obtained from a theoretical analysis differ markedly from what can be showed from an empirical analysis of the situation. Whereas the situation, on the surface seems to be of a simple battle for supremacy in the Middle East between two states competing for hegemony, a Wendtian analysis shows that the interaction between states since 1953 is responsible for the creation of a conception of identity and interest between the states which cannot be seen from a pure empirical overview. The conclusion explains the fractious relationship between the two states over the last thirty years through this Wendtian analytical framework and shows that the future of this relationship depends on interaction between the two states - not from a simple exchange of good deeds and favours which seemed to foster good relations during the reign of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, but rather in the longer term as the two nations learn to trust each other through a long process of interaction which should, eventually, lead to them both developing a new conception of "self" and "other", essential components of the at times close and at times very distant relations between them over the last 56 years. en
dc.language.iso en
dc.title A constructivist analysis of the U.S. Rogue State policy in towards Iran en
dc.identifier.laitoskoodi 711
dc.type.ontasot master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot pro gradu -tutkielmat fi
dc.type.ontasot pro gradu-avhandlingar sv
dc.type.dcmitype Text
dc.format.content abstractOnly

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
abstract.html 5.632Kb HTML View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record