Multi-annual modes in the 20th century temperature variability in reanalyses and CMIP5 models

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/170123

Citation

Järvinen , H , Seitola , T , Silen , J & Räisänen , J 2016 , ' Multi-annual modes in the 20th century temperature variability in reanalyses and CMIP5 models ' , Geoscientific Model Development , vol. 9 , no. 11 , pp. 4097-4109 . https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4097-2016

Title: Multi-annual modes in the 20th century temperature variability in reanalyses and CMIP5 models
Author: Järvinen, Heikki; Seitola, Teija; Silen, Johan; Räisänen, Jouni
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Physics
University of Helsinki, Department of Physics
University of Helsinki, Department of Physics
Date: 2016-11-17
Language: eng
Number of pages: 13
Belongs to series: Geoscientific Model Development
ISSN: 1991-959X
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/170123
Abstract: A performance expectation is that Earth system models simulate well the climate mean state and the climate variability. To test this expectation, we decompose two 20th century reanalysis data sets and 12 CMIP5 model simulations for the years 1901-2005 of the monthly mean near-surface air temperature using randomised multi-channel singular spectrum analysis (RMSSA). Due to the relatively short time span, we concentrate on the representation of multi-annual variability which the RMSSA method effectively captures as separate and mutually orthogonal spatio-temporal components. This decomposition is a unique way to separate statistically significant quasi-periodic oscillations from one another in high-dimensional data sets. The main results are as follows. First, the total spectra for the two reanalysis data sets are remarkably similar in all timescales, except that the spectral power in ERA-20C is systematically slightly higher than in 20CR. Apart from the slow components related to multi-decadal periodicities, ENSO oscillations with approximately 3.5- and 5-year periods are the most prominent forms of variability in both reanalyses. In 20CR, these are relatively slightly more pronounced than in ERA-20C. Since about the 1970s, the amplitudes of the 3.5- and 5-year oscillations have increased, presumably due to some combination of forced climate change, intrinsic low-frequency climate variability, or change in global observing network. Second, none of the 12 coupled climate models closely reproduce all aspects of the reanalysis spectra, although some models represent many aspects well. For instance, the GFDL-ESM2M model has two nicely separated ENSO periods although they are relatively too prominent as compared with the reanalyses. There is an extensive Supplement and YouTube videos to illustrate the multi-annual variability of the data sets.
Subject: TIME-SERIES
NOISE
OSCILLATIONS
DYNAMICS
114 Physical sciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
gmd_9_4097_2016.pdf 2.879Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record