Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study : Common Reasons for Withdrawing

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/174572

Citation

Lernmark , B , Lynch , K , Baxter , J , Roth , R , Simell , T , Smith , L , Swartling , U , Johnson , S B , TEDDY Study Grp & Knip , M 2016 , ' Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study : Common Reasons for Withdrawing ' , Journal of diabetes research , vol. 2016 , 2720650 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2720650

Title: Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study : Common Reasons for Withdrawing
Author: Lernmark, Barbro; Lynch, Kristian; Baxter, Judith; Roth, Roswith; Simell, Tuula; Smith, Laura; Swartling, Ulrica; Johnson, Suzanne Bennett; TEDDY Study Grp; Knip, Mikael
Contributor organization: Clinicum
Mikael Knip / Principal Investigator
Children's Hospital
Lastentautien yksikkö
HUS Children and Adolescents
Date: 2016
Language: eng
Number of pages: 13
Belongs to series: Journal of diabetes research
ISSN: 2314-6745
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2720650
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/174572
Abstract: Background. To characterize participant reasons for withdrawing from a diabetes focused longitudinal clinical observational trial (TEDDY) during the first three study years. Methods. 8677 children were recruited into the TEDDY study. At participant withdrawal staff recorded any reason parents provided for withdrawal. Reasons were categorized into (1) family characteristics and (2) protocol reasons. Families who informed staff of their withdrawal were classified as active withdrawals (AW); families without a final contact were considered passive withdrawals (PW). Results. Withdrawal was highest during the first study year (n = 1220). Most families were AW(n = 1549; 73.4%). PW was more common in the United States (n = 1001; 37.8%) and among young mothers (p = 0.001). The most frequent protocol characteristic was blood draw (55%) and the most common family reason was not having enough time (66%). The blood draw was more common among female participants; being too busy was more common among males. Both reasons were associated with study satisfaction. Conclusions. Results suggest that, for families of children genetically at risk for diabetes, procedures that can be painful/frightening should be used with caution. Study procedures must also be considered for the demands placed on participants. Study satisfaction should be regularly assessed as an indicator of risk for withdrawal.
Description: M. Knip on TEDDY Study Grp -työryhmän jäsen.
Subject: INTERVENTION
PREDICTORS
TEDDY
COMPLETION
ATTRITION
CHILDREN
PROGRAM
TRIAL
RISK
PAIN
3121 General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
2720650.pdf 1.377Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record