Is the Periodic Table all right ("PT OK")?

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/176050

Citation

Pyykkö , P 2016 , Is the Periodic Table all right ("PT OK")? in D Rudolph (ed.) , Nobel Symposium NS 160 : Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements . , 01001 , EPJ Web of Conferences , vol. 131 , EDP sciences , Nobel Symposium NS 160 – Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements , Bäckaskog Castle , Sweden , 29/05/2016 . DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201613101001

Title: Is the Periodic Table all right ("PT OK")?
Author: Pyykkö, Pekka
Other contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
Rudolph, D.
Publisher: EDP sciences
Date: 2016
Language: eng
Number of pages: 6
Belongs to series: Nobel Symposium NS 160 Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements
Belongs to series: EPJ Web of Conferences
ISBN: 978-2-7598-9011-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201613101001
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/176050
Abstract: The history of the Periodic Table and its predecessors spans almost 200 years. The present IUPAC PT for Z = 1-118 is still adequate. The remarkable measurement for the Lr atom does not change the chemistry. The extensions up to Z = 172 are discussed and compared. New data for ions are presented. The "Madelung rule" is found to be surprisingly good even in that range.
Subject: SUPERHEAVY ELEMENTS
ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATIONS
CHEMISTRY
LAWRENCIUM
116 Chemical sciences
114 Physical sciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
No321.pdf 448.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record