Is the Periodic Table all right ("PT OK")?

Visa fullständig post



Permalänk

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/176050

Citation

Pyykkö , P 2016 , Is the Periodic Table all right ("PT OK")? in D Rudolph (ed.) , Nobel Symposium NS 160 : Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements . , 01001 , EPJ Web of Conferences , vol. 131 , EDP sciences , Nobel Symposium NS 160 – Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements , Bäckaskog Castle , Sweden , 29/05/2016 . DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201613101001

Titel: Is the Periodic Table all right ("PT OK")?
Författare: Pyykkö, Pekka
Medarbetare: University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry
Rudolph, D.
Utgivare: EDP sciences
Datum: 2016
Språk: eng
Sidantal: 6
Tillhör serie: Nobel Symposium NS 160 Chemistry and Physics of Heavy and Superheavy Elements
Tillhör serie: EPJ Web of Conferences
ISBN: 978-2-7598-9011-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201613101001
Permanenta länken (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10138/176050
Abstrakt: The history of the Periodic Table and its predecessors spans almost 200 years. The present IUPAC PT for Z = 1-118 is still adequate. The remarkable measurement for the Lr atom does not change the chemistry. The extensions up to Z = 172 are discussed and compared. New data for ions are presented. The "Madelung rule" is found to be surprisingly good even in that range.
Subject: SUPERHEAVY ELEMENTS
ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATIONS
CHEMISTRY
LAWRENCIUM
116 Chemical sciences
114 Physical sciences
Licens:


Filer under denna titel

Totalt antal nerladdningar: Laddar...

Filer Storlek Format Granska
No321.pdf 448.6Kb PDF Granska/Öppna

Detta dokument registreras i samling:

Visa fullständig post