How to Deal with Unbelievable Assertions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nykänen, Matti
dc.contributor.author Hakli, Raul
dc.contributor.author Eloranta, Satu
dc.contributor.author Niinivaara, Olli
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-21T17:02:01Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-21T17:02:01Z
dc.date.issued 2016-11-29
dc.identifier.citation Nykänen , M , Hakli , R , Eloranta , S & Niinivaara , O 2016 , ' How to Deal with Unbelievable Assertions ' , Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence , vol. 78 , no. 3-4 , pp. 323-360 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9493-3
dc.identifier.other PURE: 58514337
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 76931bc1-cd9a-4017-8daf-3c9e3f89ad0d
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 84951917186
dc.identifier.other WOS: 000388851200006
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0001-8201-6409/work/54791844
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0002-6846-9716/work/92593549
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/177967
dc.description.abstract We tackle the problem that arises when an agent receives unbelievable information. Information is unbelievable if it conflicts with the agent’s convictions, that is, what the agent considers knowledge. We propose two solutions based on modifying the information so that it is no longer unbelievable. In one solution, the source and the receiver of the information cooperatively resolve the conflict. For this purpose we introduce a dialogue protocol in which the receiver explains what is wrong with the information by using logical interpolation, and the source produces a new assertion accordingly. If such cooperation is not possible, we propose an alternative solution in which the receiver revises the new piece of information by its own convictions to make it acceptable. en
dc.format.extent 38
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject 113 Computer and information sciences
dc.title How to Deal with Unbelievable Assertions en
dc.type Article
dc.contributor.organization Department of Computer Science
dc.contributor.organization TINT – Centre for Philosophy of Social Science
dc.description.reviewstatus Peer reviewed
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-015-9493-3
dc.relation.issn 1012-2443
dc.rights.accesslevel openAccess
dc.type.version acceptedVersion
dc.relation.funder Unknown funder
dc.relation.grantnumber

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
amai_main_11.pdf 235.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record