Browsing by Title

Sort by: Order: Results:

Now showing items 20-39 of 54
  • Utter, Robert (Helsingin yliopisto, 2007)
    There are many ways in which a society can define its relationship to the surrounding environment. Opinions vary from one member of society to the next and quite often in conversation it is imaginable that one might allude that questions of good or bad, or better or worse environmental quality are matters of taste and policy, but hardly a subject for serious analytical legal debate. Nonetheless, even a superfluous glance at law books, published case law, or juridical literature seems to indicate the contrary. Environmental quality is at the heart of many legal disputes, and references to the relevance of what the standard of environmental quality should be in a particular case are abundant. Therefore one can pose the question: When and how have statements of the requirements for environmental quality suddenly elevated into the realm of juridical discourse? In this particular study, which is of a jurisprudential nature, this is the pivotal question. With recourse to the theory of speech acts and what could be entitled its jurisprudential offspring, an institutional theory of law, it is possible on a theoretical level to construe an ideal umbrella concept, which in this particular context has been christened the environmental quality norm. This concept is the fundamental model upon which the idea of a normative environmental quality is developed and, according to the underlying argument of the entire thesis, in essence forms the whole structure, function, and logic of all legal regulation by man as to the relationship between him and his surroundings. An environmental quality norm is divided into two sub-norms, the institutive norm and the consequential norm. The first institutionalizes a circumstance or function in the environment, while the second defines the repercussions of interference, be it factual or potential, with the institutionalized circumstance or function. This particular research has focused mainly on the institutive norm, which is the more interesting from an analytical point of view, the consequential norm being of particular interest in debates concerning the choice of environmental policy instruments and arguments pertaining to efficiency. The envisaged theoretical model of the environmental quality norm finds its kinship in regulation relating to nuisance. Many of the central ideas on nuisance developed by the legal minds of past centuries can be transformed, with some alterations, into contemporary legal dogmas. Equipped with these tools, contemporary environmental law has been analyzed in substantial parts of the thesis. The results indicate a clear leaning towards the fact that contemporary environmental law, i.e., basically any legal instrument regulating the relationship between man and his surroundings, is indeed structured upon the very idea embodied in the abstract environmental quality norm and its two components, the institutive norm and the consequential norm.
  • Hirvonen, Ari (Helsingin yliopisto, 2000)
  • Oja, Simo S. (Helsingin yliopisto, 2011)
    The use of animals in scientific experiments tends to arouse strong emotional reactions among the general public, the most essential concern being the pain and suffering they cause. It is felt that suffering inflicted on other beings, including animals, is not morally acceptable. Is the function of a researcher who uses animals morally acceptable and beneficial for humans and animals? May such a researcher him/herself decide what animal experiments he/she can perform or should some outsider have the right to decide what kind of experiments a researcher can or cannot perform? The research material comprises the legislation of Finland and that of some member and non-member states of the European Union, together with European Union directives and pertinent preparatory parliamentary documents. The author has likewise studied the vast literature on animal rights, both pro and contra writings and opinions. The opinions of philosophers on the moral and legal rights of animals are markedly conflicting. Some strongly support the existence of rights, while others totally refute such an opinion, claiming that the question is only of the moral principles of man himself which imply that animals must be treated in a human manner. Speaking of animal rights only tends to muddle ideas on the one hand in philosophical considerations and in legal analyses on the other. The development of legislation in Finland and some other member states of the European Union has in principle been similar. In Finland, the positive laws on animal experiments nowadays comply with the EU directive 86/609/EEC. However, there are marked differences between member states in respect of the way they have in practice implemented the principles of the EU directive. No essential alterations have in practice been discernible in the actual performance of animal experiments during the decades when legislation has been developed in different countries. Self-regulation within the scientific community has been markedly more effectual than legislative procedures. Legal regulation has nevertheless clearly influenced the quality of breeding and life conditions of experimental laboratory animals, cages for example being nowadays larger than hitherto. EU parliament and council have now accepted in September 2010 a new directive on animal experiments which must be implemented in the national legislations by January 1, 2013.
  • Leino-Sandberg, Päivi (Helsingin yliopisto, 2005)
  • Emelonye, Uchenna (Helsingin yliopisto, 2014)
    Abstract This thesis adopted the law in context methodology after due consideration of other legal research methodologies. To situate child justice within the parameters of child rights, this thesis analyzed the normative underpinning of child rights and found that its foundation is traceable to the International Bill of Human Rights. It also examined the philosophical foundations of child rights and adopted the view that it is based on inclusive legal positivism found at the intersection of natural law and positive law. This thesis validated the existing claim that child justice is predicated on the mitigated culpability of children and that whilst human rights extend to children because of their humanity, child-specific rights, including child justice accrue to them specifically due to their age and vulnerability. Having considered all the principles of child rights, this thesis elevated the principles of proportionality and the best interests of the child as twin pillars of child justice. As a standard for the humane treatment of children in conflict with the law and predicated on the premise that the twin pillars encapsulate all other principles of child rights, this thesis examined to what extent the twin pillars are incorporated and applied in the Nigerian child justice system. This thesis found that although the 2003 Child Rights Act of Nigeria meets the minimum international legislative standard, child offenders in Nigeria seldom enjoy the protective shield of the twin pillars of child justice. It corroborated the strength of the twin pillars of child justice as judicial sentencing tools and found that whereas child rights may accommodate relative sensitivities, the twin pillars of child justice are immutable and non-derogable principles for the treatment of children in conflict with the law. To ensure the promotion and protection of the rights of child offenders, this thesis recommended the amendment of the Child Rights Act and the immediate establishment of all the enablers contemplated therein. Although the review of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria was not the main focus of this thesis, it however found that certain provisions of the constitution inhibit the enjoyment of child rights. Exploring the opportunity presented by the ongoing constitutional reform in Nigeria, this thesis recommended the amendment of some sections of the constitution.
  • Matikainen, Tanja (Helsingin yliopisto, 2014)
    Title: The principle of adequate financial resources acting as a guarantor for local self-government: A study on the application of the principle of adequate financial resources In Finland local authorities are responsible for providing welfare services. The state has delegated the provision of welfare services to local authorities, while the state is responsible for law drafting and providing the municipalities with adequate funding for their statutory responsibilities. The central and local governments thus share the responsibility for ensuring the realization of basic rights. Local authorities have the right to levy taxes to ensure municipal financial independence. Municipalities are entitled to central government transfers for their statutory duties. The financial responsibility for the statutory responsibilities is divided between the central and the local government. The local government tax base and the level of central government transfers have been cut down drastically. Statutory obligations have not, however, diminished at the same time; on the contrary, local government has been given new tasks and existing ones have expanded. This has resulted in a significant imbalance in the local government economy. The principle of adequate financial resources is recognized in the European Charter of Local Self-Government in Article 9.2. According to the provision, local authorities' financial resources shall be commensurate with the responsibilities provided for by the constitution and the law. The principle was put into practice in Finland during the reform of basic rights. Since then, the principle has consistently been adopted in the statements of the Constitutional Law Committee and the Administration Committee. The study examines the implementation of the principle of adequate financial resources: the principle as a guarantor of local self-government. The first research task is to clarify the content as well as the status of the principle of adequate financial resources as part of the legal order. The second research task is to investigate the financial relations between the central and the local government in terms of principle of adequate financial resources. The third research task is to figure out how the principle of adequate financial resources is applied and complied with in Finland and the other Nordic countries. The research is of a legal nature with a focus on local government law. Local government law in this study is understood functionally, i.e. local government law is that part of the legal order which in an essential way concerns local government activities and tasks. The main research method is practical jurisprudence; comparative law is also used as a secondary method in the study. The results show that the principle of adequate financial resources has a demonstrable status as a constitutional principle, and in addition, the principle has the required institutional support of a provision. There are problems in the realization of the principle, however, and thus it cannot be stated that the principle is realized at this time. The financial cost impacts are systematically underestimated in government proposals, which cause problems for municipal finances. Cuts in the local government tax base are compensated with central government transfers, in which case the revenue previously belonging to the field of self-government switches over to the field of political policy-making and becomes a target for cuts. The central government transfer system is no longer considered as the basis for a financial relation between central and local governments, which causes problems. In addition, the program procedure for basic public services does not have the effectiveness it should for the realization of the principle. For these reasons findings suggest that § 121 of the Finnish Constitution should be amended with a provision of the principle of adequate financial resources.
  • Bräutigam, Tobias (2008)
    The doctoral dissertation deals with conflicts between access rights to public information and other legally protected interests, such as trade secrets or national security in comparative perspective. While the dissertation develops an own approach to comparative law, it focuses on the German Informationsfreiheitsgesetz (IFG) in substance matters. The German IFG is contrasted with two other laws, namely the Finnish Julkisuuslaki (JL) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) of the USA. After a brief introduction, a methodological chapter takes up the most essential question of comparative law: How to compare? The methodology is developed by analysing two challenges of comparative law. The first challenge is presented by what I term the off-the-shelf critique, i.e. a critique that applies to all comparative legal monographs. Comparing law can never fully succeed because it can always be attacked for being too shallow or for including too many details. There is no happy medium. The second critique is more fundamental and denies the possibility of meaningful comparison at all, mainly for epistemological reasons. This doctoral dissertation deals with those problems in the following way. To begin with, access to documents is defined narrowly. Secondly, the legal culture is seen as a key to understand different freedom of information laws. Further, before starting to compare, a neutral description of the Act in question is done. Fourthly, throughout the work I point the reader to the idiosyncrasy of the legal terms of different jurisdictions by e.g. marking the terms in italics. Finally and most importantly, I will concentrate on conflicts of different legally protected interests. The FOIA of the USA and the Finnish JL are analysed according to this methodology. Both chapters start with an analysis of the legal culture influencing access to information and go on to outline the main characteristics of the respective Acts. The main part of those chapters is devoted to an analysis of five central conflicts. Those conflicts concern national security, procedural rights, privacy, trade secrets and challenges of administrative procedure with access rights of citizens. The last chapter applies the same methodology to the German IFG, and compares this law with the findings of the FOIA of the USA and the Finnish JL in order to answer the question whether the German act is up to the international standard. In the dissertation, freedom of information laws are classified in three categories. While the FOIA and especially the JL have evolved to the highest categories, the IFG has several weaknesses that make it poorly fit for the information age.
  • Similä, Jukka (Helsingin yliopisto, 2007)
    This study based on regulatory theory aims to provide new insights on how Finnish air and water pollution regulation has worked. Which features make pollution regulation effective and efficient? Does pollution regulation foster technological development? Are new policy instruments replacing traditional regulation? What should the role of European-wide standards be? How could regulation be improved? These and other regulatory issues are examined. Due to the preparation for EU membership, the amount of annually adopted environmental legislation peaked in 1994. However, excluding the impact of EU membership the amount of environmental legislation continues to increase. The rate of legislative change has been rapid. Only a few pieces of legislation in force were adopted prior 1990 and about one third is less than 5 years old. Most of new legislation relates to traditional regulation, although there is more legislation than before on economic instruments and other new policy instruments. However, the impact of new instruments on the total volume of legislation is slight. There is no evidence to suggest that the relevance of new policy instruments for the achievement of policy goals exceeds their relative amount. The relative role of environmental agreements not based on new legislation is even smaller. This does not support a significant shift towards new policy instruments as often suggested in the literature. About 30 % of the environmental legislation between 1994 and 2003 was implementing EU legislation. This is more than in most other policy sectors. The most Europeanized environmental policies were waste, chemicals, and pollution control. It is likely that the EU impact is greater than the relative amount of implementing legislation suggests. Most substantial changes of environmental regulation are affected by EU policy. In the long run, impacts on technological development are crucial for environmental policy. This study shows that water pollution regulation has often forced the pulp and paper industry to adopt new end-of-pipe technologies. In addition, this, with other factors, has influenced the development of process technologies. Integrated pollution regulation (adopted in 2000) aimed to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of policy. Although the number of regulated units did not increase, the more comprehensive way of regulation improved its effectiveness. After the reform new opportunities to set priorities were also created and used. No impacts based on cross-media effects were observed. The fact that elements of the previous sectoral system were transferred to the new system hampered the achievement of the full potential of integrated regulation. Integrated pollution regulation could be improved. In particular the regulation of minor activities should be made lighter through the repeal of obsolete requirements, development of new control methods and standardization of information gathering. With regard to major activities, the combination of economic instruments and integrated permitting would increase effectiveness and efficiency. The creation of common markets for those developing technologies would foster technological development. However, to ensure efficiency of regulation standard-setting should remain differentiated. The enlargement of the size of regulated unit would make it more efficient. Key words: regulatory theory, policy evaluation, environment, pollution control, regulation, effectiveness, efficiency, technological development
  • Gozdecka, Dorota Anna (Helsingin yliopisto, 2009)
    This dissertation s main research questions concern common European principles of democracy in regard to religious freedom. It deals with the modern understanding of European democracy and is a combination of interdisciplinary research on law, culture, politics and philosophy. The main objective of this research is to identify common European legal principles and standards applying to religious freedom and compare them with standards and approaches in particular states. The bases for the analysis are the principles of equality and religious pluralism. It approaches issues such as the problems of defining religion and the pursuit of religious equality vis-à-vis principles of establishment or quasi-establishment of traditional European religions. In analytical part it critically approaches the commitment of European countries to principles of equality and religious pluralism on examples of selected problematic areas. These areas include women s reproductive rights, problems of blasphemy and hate speech and relationships between religion and education. It evaluates the impact of various legal regulations in Europe and their influence on religious or non-religious individuals. Finally, in the theoretical part the research deals with the sustainable model of democracy in the multicultural era. It evaluates the possibilities for extending the legal system s flexibility towards other legal systems, such as Sharia law. Finally, it joins more general discussion on European values, commitment of European states to these values and further perspectives for European integration on axiological level. The analysis shows that currently European consensus and commitment to values of equality and religious pluralism lacks consistency. Even religion itself is not uniformly understood. The question whether the state should remain neutral towards doctrines and to what degree has neither been approached with sufficient coherence. While traditional Christian religions still enjoy a wide margin of religious freedom, even in public sphere, new religious movements or culturally new religions are often restrained. Without common commitment to European values, the principle of pluralism and equality is bound to be applied selectively. It is important that the model of European democracy adjusts to the conditions of religious pluralism. Without coherence in application of democratic principles and rights, Europe is bound to be plagued by guilty conscience of double standardisation and emptiness of the European soul .
  • Reyes Gomez, Javier Alberto (2014)
    Law & Economics is the hegemonic framework in mainstream corporate governance theory and praxis. It permeates how legal scholars see corporations, how they must be managed, and to which ends they should be geared to. Because large amount of power is concentrated and exercised through corporations, the fact that law & economics is both a descriptive and a normative theory has an impact on the shaping of the world. This research aims at asking: is there an alternative normative jurisprudence to law & economics in corporate governance? In order to approach this task, the methodology used is hybrid, leaning towards a hermeneutical qualitative non-doctrinal approach, inspired by the mapping and criticism analysis of Roberto Mangabeira Unger and Dworkin s interpretivism all within the greater context of critical legal theory. This allows the research to make a detailed exploration of current structures and unearth its ideological underpinnings. The research starts by pinpointing the importance of corporate governance in the context of development theory, and it dissects its ideologically charged significance within an economicist view of the world. Then, corporations are analyzed from both historical and ontological perspectives in preparation for an alternative corporate legal theory. Such a jurisprudential approach takes, first, a descriptive form, though it then evolved into a normative one, gravitating around the goal of corporate law and the contrast between the theory of the firm and political philosophy. The tenets of law & economics are then critically dissected. The main findings are that law & economics appeal arises from its sound epistemological construction. It takes off from an ethical position (i.e. utilitarianism) which then serves a methodological path (i.e. positivist empiricism), on top of which a theoretical framework is developed (i.e. neoclassical economics). Its weakness, though, consists of simplistic and erroneous elemental assumptions. Based on these findings, the research proposes an alternative to the law & economics theory of corporate governance built on top of a model which mirrors its sound epistemological construction, though centers around a normative jurisprudence analysis of individual and corporate personhood and to the core of corporations, what they really are, and what they should be used for.
  • Juutilainen, Teemu (2015)
    This study seeks the optimal way to promote compatibility between systems of proprietary security rights in Europe. The focus is on security rights over tangible movables and receivables. Compatibility is understood as the absence of cross-border problems, notably uncertain enforceability and unexpected loss of proprietary security rights, or as the availability of workable solutions to them. Current cross-border problems mainly concern enforceability of proprietary security rights against third parties, including a security-provider debtor s other creditors on insolvency. The study organises the concrete means through which compatibility can be promoted into four main groups, or approaches . These are a centralised substantive approach and three gentler approaches , namely a centralised conflicts-approach, a local conflicts-approach and a local substantive approach. Means within the centralised approaches can be introduced at European Union level, and means within the local approaches at Member State level. The substantive approaches seek to eliminate diversity by unification or harmonisation of substantive law, whereas the conflicts approaches mainly rely on private international law. The study introduces and defends the view that current circumstances call for an integrated approach, which attempts to combine the advantages and avoid the disadvantages of all four approaches. The feasibility of an integrated approach can be confirmed, and its content determined, only by way of a division of labour between the four approaches. This requires choices between the concrete means within each of the four approaches. To guide that division of labour, the study proposes a set of objectives with a view to capturing the essence of what can be regarded as desirable development towards greater compatibility. The objectives are: foreseeability, derived from the economic functions of proprietary security rights; responsiveness, derived from certain evolutionary aspects of the law; and division of unforeseeability costs, derived from a transnational conception of justice. Importantly, the tension between foreseeability and responsiveness gives rise to a theory of how to reconcile the need for certainty in credit markets and the more general need for the law to adapt to different and changing economic and social circumstances and value choices. The set of objectives provides criteria for choices between the concrete means within the four approaches. If the proposed objectives are accepted, the choices guided by them can be taken as the optimal way of promoting compatibility, which completes the research.
  • Stanikic, Teija (Suomalainen lakimiesyhdistys ry., 2015)
    The aim of this thesis is to analyze the process in which the court assesses what kind of evidential value eyewitness identification should have in an individual criminal case in court. The attention is on special features of national procedural law and on witness psychological research connected to this process. Since the stages of the criminal proceeding preceding the evaluation of evidence also have an impact on this process, the following questions have been set for this research: (1) on which factors should the evidence be gathered in cases in which an identification is made; (2) which special features are connected with the process of presenting evidence that applies to the reliability of the identification in court; and (3) how should the reliability of the eyewitness identification be analyzed in the court. The first question is partly discussed in the form of a literature review. The results of witness psychological studies conducted on the sources of errors affecting identification as the crime occurs (estimator variables) are discussed, and conclusions are made of the applicability of those experimental rules in legal settings. For instance, observation distance, exposure time, the perpetrator of the crime having masked themselves, eyewitness age and ethnic origin can influence the reliability of the identification. Secondly, the factors affecting the reliability of the identification in the police investigation (system variables) are discussed. These include, for instance, the possible use of a show-up or a lineup with fillers or the presentation of the suspect to the eyewitness in person or in a photograph. Experimental rules for the system variables have also been included into the Finnish procedural regulation of police investigations. The focus of this research is also to study that regulation using the research method of the interpretation and systematization of legal rules. In addition to this, propositions for the developing of legislation de lege ferenda are made based on witness psychological research and practical points. An important result in this part of the study is that the valid regulation mainly corresponds to the results of witness psychological research. However, development needs have been detected. The regulation is partially contradictory and insufficient, and the terminology used in it is partly unsettled and not accurate. Another problem is that the rules have been deconcentrated in different levels of legal regulation. For this reason the regulation includes overlapping rules and several rules that refer to other rules. How to interpret the latter is questionable. For instance, the legal rules for the method of identification in which a single suspect is shown to a witness by the police remain unclear. Thus, through the interpretation of the regulation this study also clarifies which procedural regulation should be followed when identification is put into practice in different ways for example, as a show-up, a lineup or a photograph or video identification. In addition, the experimental results of witness psychological research support some specific new procedural rules being included into the legislation. These are also presented in this study. In answer to the first research question, the objective of gathering the evidence in its entirety is the error sources in identification and the other factors affecting reliability. In addition to this, collecting evidence of the eyewitness confidence and the time used for identification is recommended. When evaluating evidence, the level of confidence, however, should be taken into consideration only under specific conditions mentioned in the research. The second question is considered in the light of the rules and principles for the legal procedure of the presentation of evidence. Interpretation and systematization is used as the method, and witness psychological research results are considered. The study showed that the rules and other principles for the legal procedure together with the principle of the free presentation of evidence facilitate the presentation of the evidence applying to the identification error sources per se. Procedural principles, however, must be interpreted in a way that allows the use of the police identification report and police identification video as evidence in the trial. When gathering and presenting the evidence, the objectivity principle has an essential importance as well as the witness psychological expertise of the prosecutor and suspect's assistant. Further, the court should find out, on the basis of its duty to lead the process and with specific preconditions that have been specified in this study, what factors have influenced the reliability of the identification. For the most part, the use of expert witnesses is advisable only in connection with the identification of criminals suspected of serious crimes. The third question focuses on the evaluation of eyewitness identification evidence on the basis of the argumentation presented in the theories of evaluating evidence. The analysis model of identification reliability is represented as a solution to the question of how the reliability of eyewitness identification should be analyzed in court. It is essential in this model that when the principle of the free evaluation of evidence is dominant, the reliability of the identification is analyzed utilizing witness psychological rules by specifying them, yet always considering their probable value. When applying experimental rules in a single case, the circumstances and characteristics of the case must be taken into consideration, as well. The frequency-based theories of juror decision-making are rejected as not suitable for the analysis. Certain preconditions are also set for the use of the Story Model and the method based on falsification of hypotheses by Christian Diesen. The importance of a sufficient account for the factors affecting the reliability of the identification is emphasized as a part of the analysis, and evaluating the sufficiency separately is recommended. Categorization of the identification error sources is suggested for helping the analyzing process. This categorization should be made of the factors affecting the reliability before and during the investigation. The research also outlines how evidence relating to the identity of the perpetrator other than eyewitness identification and the gravity of the crime affect the analysis. In its entirety the analysis is different in each case, and the judge's intuition has a significant importance in applying the experimental rules of witness psychological research, especially in assessing the joint influence of the different factors affecting the reliability of the identification. Case material is also utilized in the study. Practical information based on the material is provided about the evaluation of eyewitness identification evidence in court a few points are also made about the identification procedures of the police. In the future, it is of great importance that the results of witness psychological studies are taken into consideration in the regulation of identification proceedings and in its interpretation as well as in the development of the quality of the analysis in individual cases in court.
  • Mononen, Marko (Helsingin yliopisto, 2001)
  • Pere, Tuula (Fourth Life Publishing, 2015)
    PROTECTED, TOLERATED OR SANCTIONED FREEDOM OF SPEECH? A legal-historical study on the impact of the social and cultural shift of the 1960 s and 1970 s on the limits of the freedom of speech in mass communication in Finland. This legal historical study looked into the impact of the social and cultural shift in the 1960 s and 1970 s on the limits of the freedom of speech in the Finnish mass media as it was exercised by the press, radio and television. The limits of the freedom of speech were considered in the broad sense of the term, with focus not only on legal regulation and self-regulation but also on the actual limits in exercising the freedom of speech. Mass communication during the shift was represented by strongly opposing ideologies, and it was utilised both in supporting the prevailing hegemony and in toppling it. Mass communication took to supervising the powers of other forces, becoming a social influence a fourth estate even, in some people s view. After the war years, the Finnish society had been rebuilt in a joint effort, improving the situation of its citizens by means of social, health and educational policies and by specifying the practices of the labour market. However, the actual social and cultural shift did not take place until the 1960 s and 1970 s and had to do with the changes in the economic and demographic structures and the emergence of the baby-boom generation as active citizens. Aside from material good, a wider population could now benefit from higher education, which enabled them to climb the social ladder and thus provide them with more influence. The welfare state developed hand in hand with the democratic opportunities of the citizens. A citizen had become interesting both as a voter and a consumer. The volume and technology of communication developed significantly, bringing about a new climate of opinion, which changed people s ideas about the appropriate limits of the freedom of speech. To analyse the judicial shift under study, a contextual legal historical approach was employed. Owing to the nature of the research at hand, connections to the different fields of law and the fields of science are manifold. The study, which falls into the field of law, has points in common mostly with the perspectives of the studies of social sciences, cultural history and social history and history of ideologies. The data gathered from the subject of study have been analysed by linking together previous findings in rarely seen ways. The analysis focused primarily on the national level. The domestic phenomena were closely linked with the equivalent developments of other Western countries the Nordic countries in particular. Moreover, comparisons were made with the developments in the United States, as they influenced the Finnish society as well cf. the peace movement, the women s movement, racial issues, the increasing activism among youth, and the commercial use of the freedom of speech. On the other hand, the international situation of the cold war era, the political pressure coming from the Soviet Union, and the phenomenon of finlandisation, had an impact on the speech and mass communication in Finland. The changes in the Finnish mass communication environment during the shift involved the structures, operating conditions and media contents alike. The transformed attitudes were manifested both in the discussed topics and the manner in which they were discussed. There was an increase in the diversity of opinion, the differences of opinion came to a head, and the media were subjected to both internal and external pressure. Mass communication was actively involved in the social development. Tabloids brought their own flavour to the opposing interests in mass communication, managing successfully to turn the voyeuristic and sensation-seeking behaviour of people into profitable business. As the research progressed, it became evident that if it was still possible to discern some sort of collective idea of the freedom of speech with the advent of the 1960 s, this became increasingly difficult once the shift got properly underway. The old boundaries were pushed both in the political mass communication and politically-oriented entertainment. On the European scale, the Finnish television system was from the very beginning a unique and curious combination of both ideological and commercial elements and players. The coupling of the commercial media with the parliamentary-controlled Finnish Broadcasting Company (Yleisradio) was a difficult political issue right from the early days of Finnish television. In the era of Reporadio, (a pejorative nickname referring to the President of the company at the time) television, the newcomer in the electronic media, brought forth leftist mass communication and entertainment. This was offset by the American-oriented worldview of commercials, series and films. The operating environments for exercising the political freedom of speech and the commercial communications saw a rapid transformation. Finland s location at the interface between the East and the West was also manifested in how two opposing ideologies collided in the Finnish mass media. At the core of the freedom of speech in mass communication in the social and political sphere of mass communication there was a tough ideological battle going on, with the leftist orientation and the even wider bowing to the East not uncommon during the era of finlandisation strongly represented. Besides the leftist party papers and various ideological papers, the leftist tendencies in the press were also represented by a group of radical reporters within the mainstream press. The new practices of mass communication, and breaking the old boundaries in the spirit of a cultural shift, sometimes caused disapproval and backlashes in all areas of communications. Offences against religious and moral beliefs and patriotic feelings became the topic of hot debates and were discussed by the various bodies controlling the use of words by mass media even in the courts of law. The transformed society was coloured by an array of opinions, and the interpretations as to the limits of the freedom of speech varied greatly. New demarcations and supportive regulation thereof were called for. The legal regulation as to how the mass media exercised the freedom of speech did not essentially change during the period under study, leaving the effects of the changes on the everyday life of mass communications rather insignificant as a whole. As for self-regulation, the mass media and advertising aimed proactively and voluntarily to act appropriately in the media. Despite long preparations, numerous law initiatives fizzled out or were only implemented in the decades to come. However, the effort put in the preparation made a difference in the political life and public debate of the era. Advertising was subject to harsh criticism particularly from the left wing and the consumer movement, forcing the legislature and the self-regulatory norms to tighten up, particularly in alcohol and tobacco advertising. Legislative means were also employed for better protection of privacy threatened by the tabloids. The factors most affecting the boundaries of the freedom of speech were seldom discernible in regulatory actions. The actual freedom of speech exercised in mass communication was in some cases wider than the formal regulation, which trailed behind, while in some cases narrower, due to practical operational preconditions or external pressure, for instance. In comparison with the past, freedom of speech as a whole flourished relatively freely, despite the fact that the regulations were not loosened or modernised. It was more about a greater flexibility and tolerance of control and decision-making which aimed to facilitate the releasing of shift era pressures. On the other hand, the political restrictions and self-censorship due to the pressure built up during the period of finlandisation clearly limited the freedom of speech in mass communication.
  • Vihriälä, Helena (Helsingin yliopisto, 2012)
    I pose two questions in my thesis. The first one asks how the theories of intention based on knowledge go together with the understanding of human agency in the philosophy of mind, cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Is the Finnish legislation on intent based probability theory satisfactory or should the legislation allow intention to be assessed also on the basis of the will as well? In Finland and in many other European countries the traditional approach to intent has been that the prosecutor has to prove, firstly, that the accused has committed the crime and, secondly, that the accused has had the necessary knowledge and will while acting. This is based on a Cartesian view of two separate entities: body and mind. In my review of literature it is apparent that the Cartesian view no longer dominates in the philosophy of mind. According to cognitive psychology and neuroscience a human being is an entity, where one cannot separate action and thought. It is very difficult if not impossible to find out what the criminal had in mind when he committed the crime. Psychologists can tell something about the possible reasons why someone acts criminally based on the knowledge of the suspect s history. But even such an expert assessment is likely to be incomplete and uncertain. Judges from whom extensive psychological expertise cannot be expected have even less chance of reliably inferring about the thoughts of the accused at the time of the act. I conclude that we can only judge people on the basis of their deeds, as we do in the other areas of life. We have objective knowledge of the act and how dangerous it was. If the accused is liable and of age (18 years), we have to assume that he or she had understood the nature of the act, if there is no proof to the contrary. In my second question, I ask if the intention has to be proved separately from the act as seen in the judicial literature or can it be proved based on the act. Which one is dominant in the legal praxis? I analysed about a hundred cases from the Supreme Court and the Court of appeal in Helsinki. I also circulated a questionnaire to the judges in the Helsinki area. Both strongly support the conclusion that the legal praxis does not attempt to make judgements about intent separately from establishing the facts. The guilt is assessed on the basis of the objective facts about the act.
  • Koistinen, Jarmo (Helsingin yliopisto, 2012)
    The main aim of the study is to explore the similarities and differences of criminal liability for economic offences which arises from the constituent elements of a crime as set by Russian and Finnish criminal law. As regards the classification of Russian and Finnish criminal law into different legal families, a systematic comparative analysis was designed to take into account the differing social and historical contexts of the legal systems to be compared. The comparative analysis of the constituent elements of a crime shows that the scope of criminal liability for tax offences, bankruptcy offences and money laundering is narrower in Russian criminal law in comparison with Finnish criminal law. This finding consistently corresponds to the theory of Russian criminal law and previous studies on this subject. One of the main distinctive constituent elements of the objective side of a crime is the nature of the consequences caused by an offence. Evasion of payment of taxes and/or charges by an organization is treated as a crime in the case that the evasion has been committed on a large or an especially large scale. Furthermore, unlawful actions in the event of bankruptcy are regarded as a crime if they have caused large-scale damage. Money laundering by a person as result of a commission of crime by that person is a crime when it has been committed on a large scale. When comparing the above-mentioned constituent elements to functionally corresponding Finnish provisions, a substantial difference in the conditions of the consequences caused by illegal economic actions is discovered. Accordingly, only the aggravated forms of actions according to Finnish criminal law would be qualified as crimes in Russia. In both systems, the basic rule is that the illegal economic actions are criminal when committing them intentionally. However, it is argued that in Russian criminal law, the higher degree of awareness of a potential criminal actor should be proved when comparing the conditions of intention with Finnish criminal law. On the other hand, proving a person s full awareness of the nature of illegalities is sometimes impossible in practice. In economic offences, a person s intention is often derived from objectively appreciable matters. The narrower scope of criminal liability for economic offences can be explained by different principles and grounds of criminalization and by differences in the sanction systems. In the study, the Russian administrative offence provisions, due to their repressiveness, are acknowledged as being criminal law from the Finnish point of view. The social dangerousness of actions as the main criteria of a Soviet crime still characterizes and legitimizes the criminalization of certain actions in contemporary Russian society.
  • Kontkanen, Pirjo Kristiina (Helsingin yliopisto, 2006)
    Copyright within university research and teaching Freedom of science is the basic principal at the universities. Freedom of science and copyright are both guaranteed as constitutional rights. Constitutional rights act as principals. When deciding a concrete case one has to chart which rights are applicable and then weight the balance of the rights. When studying copyright one has to take into account also directives and international agreements. National rules on copyright are based on several international agreements and a lot of directives have been given to harmonize national regulations. In principal constitutional rights such as scientific freedom have been ensured and taken into account when enacting copyright legislation. Changes in society and universities, however, create new situations where copyright appear and interact in a new way. When discussing the use of copyright protected material within university research and teaching one has to take into account how university functions have been divided into two sectors and how the principals directing university activities have to accommodate to changing conditions. In order to create more equal ways of handling copyright protected material at the universities and to ensure proper user rights for the university society university policies on copyright as well as a bit more detailed legislation on the relations between copyright and university research and teaching are needed. The present regulations do not ensure the rights of the university society to needed extent but leave too many situations uncertain.
  • Ellilä, Kalevi (Helsingin yliopisto, 2007)
    Public Health-care Claims during the Years 1994-2007 in Finland The aim of the study was to interpret and systematise patients rights. The goal of the claims was to improve the patients health condition or otherwise the use of the health services. The focus of this research is on the public health-care section. The first main problem was to investigate how to prove whether a fault exists among health-care matters. Another main problem was to check how the patients rights were fulfilled. The offices that were examined were that of the Ombudsman, the Chancellor of Justice, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, and the Provincial State Office of Southern Finland. In addition, as controls, the Supreme Administrative Court and the National Authority of Medicolegal Affairs were also examined. More precise research problems, in addition to the main questions were: 1. On which general goals are a patient s rights based? 2. Which benefits and disadvantages are connected with the regulation of a patient s rights as a flexible norm? 3. What special questions arise regarding the mutual relations between the acts? 4. Equity. 5. The principle of acting in the patient s favour. 6. The indirect causes of the health claim resolutions. The results: The amount of the health claims dramatically increased. The claimant won his or her case in 25% of the cases. The cases came from only 6 various branches of a possible 50. They dealt, however, with serious cases of patient s rights. The supervision institute proved to be necessary. In addition, it is recommended that the parliament pass an act to unite all various supervisors together and another act to regulate the functions of health claims.
  • Miettinen, Samuli (2015)
    How is EU criminal legislative competence regulated after the Lisbon Treaty? The European Union has always had powers which affect national criminal law. Classic internal market judgments consider whether national criminal law measures are justified restrictions of freedom of movement. The Union s direct legislative powers in this field have developed more slowly through international agreements, Treaty revision and the case law of the Court of Justice on implied powers. This study asks what powers have been conferred on the Union in the field of substantive criminal law and how the exercise of its powers may be reviewed after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. The questions raise a wide range of issues relevant to EU criminal law, but also to EU constitutional, administrative and institutional law. A state-centric view of European integration holds that EU criminal law powers were framed to preserve core areas of national sovereignty. Scholarship in the field of EU criminal law is often ambivalent or critical of centralized powers in this field. Addressing the Union s competence creep was at the heart of constitutional reforms incorporated by the Lisbon Treaty. This sentiment explains some unusual features of the field after those revisions: the emergency brake , the special position of the UK, Ireland and Denmark, limits to Court of Justice jurisdiction, the unanimity requirement for states participating in the European Public Prosecutor s office, more sensitive ex ante subsidiarity control, and limiting express criminal law powers to directives. Nevertheless, these limits are constructed from the reference point of EU institutional law. The survey of those elements shows that the foundations of these structures are unreliable. If codification was intended to limit creeping competence , the framers have failed. Case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union after December 2009 suggests that Article 83 TFEU, or even the complete set of legal bases in the Union s area of freedom, security and justice , is not an exhaustive codification of the Union s criminal law powers. The central question in the calculus, the Court s rules on choice of legal bases , has been susceptible to creative drafting and suffers from weak judicial oversight. Legislative practice suggests that the new safeguards can be sidelined in this process. Thus, the central, and important debates in EU criminal law on the meaning of specific concepts like minimum rules , what crimes can be included in the 83(1) list, and how the European Public Prosecutor should operate may be gradually sidelined by the incoming tide , or at least creeping competence in other estuaries. At the same time, Member States cling to pre-Lisbon practices that restrict the exercise of competence but which seem disconnected from the post-Lisbon legal framework. A detailed examination of this field finds anomalies in the external relations law of the Union, where pragmatism prevails. Small elements that have criminal law implications may be included within Union powers where express internal competence is doubtful. In others, declarations of competence appear to reserve powers to the Member States that the Union could lawfully exercise. The Court now accepts ancillary provisions with criminal law relevance in mainstream measures that do not offer the safeguards of the express criminal law provisions. This is demonstrated by analogy with the case law on issues in the area of freedom, security and justice . Thus, social security coordination measures can be based on the free movement provisions, criminal law obligations may be part of the common commercial policy, and agreements on the treatment of suspected pirates may properly be concluded as part of an agreement that is exclusively Common Foreign and Security Policy. The Court even allows the EU legislature to predetermine the success of any legal challenge because it relies primarily on textual evidence in recitals to determine the aim of the legislature. Thus, measures establishing information systems and exchange mechanisms concerning road traffic offences are measures of transport policy, not measures concerning cooperation in criminal matters, and data retention is an internal market measure. These judgments have surprised academics, national governments, and even EU institutions legal services. Questions also arise as to the effectiveness of the new safeguards even when they are not circumvented. The emergency brake may lead to consensualism, but it is not pulled when a Member State position that is presented as a red line is ignored. The pleadings of the opt-out states in key cases suggest that national governments are not policing their opt-out. National parliaments rarely raise formal subsidiarity concerns. Intervention is rare even if an EU proposal raises constitutional issues and overrules significant policy choices in national criminal law. National policy choices may be legitimate even if the Union has the technical capacity to overrule them. National criminal law scholars often argue that integration in criminal law will come at a high personal cost to the victims of that policy unless appropriate safeguards are developed. The Court of Justice has struggled to distinguish between criminal and civil rules in the European Union constitutional system. Instead, it has developed institutional safeguards that require, as far as possible, democratic decision-making. It has also begun to use fundamental rights, and in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to test the legality of Union action. Thus, whilst its standard of review has been criticized in the past, the findings suggest the Court may be better placed to cope with the increasing trend to treat de facto penal law as administrative rules than the corpus of EU judicial review literature suggests. This research has used standard legal research methods but combines these with an element of the law in action in the field of EU transparency law. During the research, it became clear that the key research questions required material that had not been published. In order to study the drafting processes, the study sought and obtained series of documents that were not originally released for public use. These include legislative negotiation documents, legal opinions of the legal services, and even the pleadings of Member States and EU institutions in key constitutional law cases. One document was released through litigation; another is pending litigation. Both cases raise novel points in transparency law that may have wide-reaching consequences on the nature of the EU criminal legislative process. To what extent should it be open to public scrutiny? Should the Union consider strictly defined conferral or procedural limits to the enumerated powers? The history of constitutional limits is that they are circumvented at the first opportunity when a crisis presents itself. It is possible to conceive some which are more difficult to ignore than those which appear to have buckled under the strain of post-Lisbon practice. However, when limits are drafted in a strict form, this can later cause constitutional contortions that call into question the rule of law. Instead, the present criminal competence control has been effectively proceduralized: particular steps must be taken, but their review is likely to be unintrusive or sympathetic. More legal research is required in the pre-legislative stage, even to understand the nature of competence control. Debates in poorly studied legislative forums are likely to shed great light on the Union s constitution: what happens .