Evaluating effectiveness of open assessments on alternative biofuel sources

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/182578

Lähdeviite

Sandström , V C , Tuomisto , J T , Majaniemi , S , Rintala , T & Pohjola , M V 2014 , ' Evaluating effectiveness of open assessments on alternative biofuel sources ' , Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy , vol. 10 , no. 2 , pp. 29-40 .

Julkaisun nimi: Evaluating effectiveness of open assessments on alternative biofuel sources
Tekijä: Sandström, Vilma Christina; Tuomisto, Jouni T; Majaniemi, Sami; Rintala, Teemu; Pohjola, Mikko V
Muu tekijä: University of Helsinki, Environmental Sciences
Päiväys: 2014-10-01
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 12
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
ISSN: 1548-7733
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/182578
Tiivistelmä: Biofuels have raised controversy regarding their environmental, social, and economic sustainability. The complexity of biofuel decisions and investments by both industry and society requires integration of scientific knowledge, public information, and values from a diversity of sources. Environmental assessments can identify multiple impacts of different options. Open and collaborative knowledge creation can support decisions in two ways: by building trust and credibility and by developing more robust understanding of key issues. Open assessment is a decision-support method that allows widespread participation in a transparent and freely accessible process. In this article, we evaluate two open assessment case studies concerning biodiesel production. The evaluation compiles the participants’ views regarding the potential of the assessment process to influence decisions in terms of quality of content, applicability, efficiency, and openness. According to the evaluation, openness can be feasibly implemented and is much appreciated by participants. More experience using broad and active participation is needed for further development of methods and tools. However, the currently common practices of closed and disengaged processes limit decision making. In addition, suitable tools and practices, as well as the inclusion of participants with appropriate skills, are needed to facilitate open collaboration.
Avainsanat: 1172 Environmental sciences
decision support systems
participatory planning
case studies
performance assessment
management tools
Tekijänoikeustiedot:


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
SSPP_vol10.2.1207_032.sandstrom.pdf 235.1KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot