On Blaming and Punishing Psychopaths

Show full item record




Godman , M K & Jefferson , A 2017 , ' On Blaming and Punishing Psychopaths ' , Criminal Law and Philosophy , vol. 11 , no. 9 , pp. 127-142 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9340-3

Title: On Blaming and Punishing Psychopaths
Author: Godman, Marion K; Jefferson, Anneli
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Political and Economic Studies (2010-2017)
Date: 2017
Language: eng
Number of pages: 16
Belongs to series: Criminal Law and Philosophy
ISSN: 1871-9791
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/192770
Abstract: Current legal practice holds that a diagnosis of psychopathy does not remove criminal responsibility. In contrast, many philosophers and legal experts are increasingly persuaded by evidence from experimental psychology and neuroscience indicating moral and cognitive deficits in psychopaths and have argued that they should be excused from moral responsibility. However, having opposite views concerning psychopaths’ moral responsibility, on the one hand, and criminal responsibility, on the other, seems unfortunate given the assumption that the law should, at least to some extent, react to the same desert-based considerations as do ascriptions of moral responsibility. In response, Stephen Morse has argued that the law should indeed be reformed so as to excuse those with severe psychopathy from blame, but that psychopaths that have committed criminal offences should still be subject to some legal repercussions such as civil commitment. We argue that consequentialist and norm-expressivist considerations analogous to those that support punishing psychopaths or at least retaining some legal liability, might also be drawn on in favour of holding psychopaths morally accountable.
Subject: 611 Philosophy

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
On_Blaming_and_Punishing_Psychopaths_wit.docx 72.57Kb Microsoft Word View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record