Governing cities reflexively-The biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Buizer, Marleen
dc.contributor.author Elands, Birgit
dc.contributor.author Vierikko, Kati
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-14T10:54:00Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-14T10:54:00Z
dc.date.issued 2016-08
dc.identifier.citation Buizer , M , Elands , B & Vierikko , K 2016 , ' Governing cities reflexively-The biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services ' , Environmental Science & Policy , vol. 62 , pp. 7-13 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.003
dc.identifier.other PURE: 68609556
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: e43e686d-6b78-427d-afbf-a2d7bdc6f8d4
dc.identifier.other WOS: 000378956300002
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 84973869096
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0002-6690-4016/work/32824702
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/224187
dc.description.abstract With the aim to embed ecology more forcefully into decision-making, the concept of Ecosystems Services (ES) has gained significant ground amongpolicy-makers and researchers. The increasing recognition of the importance of urban green areas for the quality of life in growing cities has led proponents of ES approaches to argue for an uptake of the approach in urban environmental decision-making. However, the ES approach has been criticized for standing too much at a distance from local communities and their day-to-day practices and for insufficiently taking into account the potential trade-offs between different qualities or preferences. In this paper we argue that other concepts, doing other work, need to be added to the debate about futures of urban governance and research. Biocultural diversity is suggested as one such alternative concept. By its emphasis On diversity, biocultural diversity can account for the many ways in which people live with green areas in the urban landscape, acknowledges the different knowledges this involves, and can reveal conflicts and ambivalence that may be at stake. This sets up for a reflexive, transdisciplinary research process that questions and contextualizes knowledge and worldviews including those of researchers. A reflexive, transdisciplinary research, then, is a productive catalyst for forms of reflexive urban governance that recognise and respond to this diversity and provide platforms for contestation. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. en
dc.format.extent 7
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Science & Policy
dc.rights cc_by
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Biocultural diversity
dc.subject Transdisciplinarity
dc.subject Reflexive governance
dc.subject Ecosystem services
dc.subject Urban planning
dc.subject KNOWLEDGE
dc.subject PLACE
dc.subject PERSPECTIVE
dc.subject SCIENCE
dc.subject TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
dc.subject RESILIENCE
dc.subject GOVERNANCE
dc.subject ECOLOGY
dc.subject SCALES
dc.subject POLICY
dc.subject 1172 Environmental sciences
dc.title Governing cities reflexively-The biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services en
dc.type Article
dc.contributor.organization Environmental Sciences
dc.description.reviewstatus Peer reviewed
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.003
dc.relation.issn 1462-9011
dc.rights.accesslevel openAccess
dc.type.version publishedVersion

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S1462901116300521_main.pdf 418.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record