Nominalism and the Via Moderna in Luther's Theological Work

Show full item record



Kärkkäinen , P A 2017 , Nominalism and the Via Moderna in Luther's Theological Work . in D R Nelson , P R Hinlicky , L Malcolm , M L Mattox , R Saarinen , A Vind & J Zachhuber (eds) , The Oxford Encyclopedia of Martin Luther . vol. 2 , Oxford Research Encyclopedias , Oxford University Press , Oxford , pp. 696-708 .

Title: Nominalism and the Via Moderna in Luther's Theological Work
Author: Kärkkäinen, Pekka Antero
Other contributor: Nelson, Derek R.
Hinlicky, Paul R.
Malcolm, Lois
Mattox, Mickey L.
Saarinen, Risto
Vind, Anna
Zachhuber, Johannes
Contributor organization: Faculty of Theology
Systematic Theology
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 2017
Language: eng
Number of pages: 13
Belongs to series: The Oxford Encyclopedia of Martin Luther
Belongs to series: Oxford Research Encyclopedias
ISBN: 9780190461843
Abstract: Luther’s adoption of the theology of the via moderna (also called the Nominalists) varied during the late medieval period. This school of thought had developed during the 15th century mainly as a method for interpreting Aristotle and relied on certain 14th-century authorities, such as William of Ockham, John Buridan, Gregory of Rimini, and Peter of Ailly among others. Luther studied philosophy according to the via moderna in Erfurt, where his teachers Jodocus Trutfetter and Bartholomaeus Arnoldi of Usingen represented a position that tolerated the Thomist and Scotist views. The school also featured a specific kind of theology based on its interpretation of Aristotle. Among the most influential theologians in the German via moderna was Gabriel Biel in Tübingen, whose theology was crucial for Luther’s understanding of the school’s positions. Besides Ockham, whom Biel mentioned as his main authority in his Sentences commentary, Biel adopted the positions of several other authors, even outside the common authorities of the via moderna. Other influential theologians and philosophers affiliated with the via moderna were John Mair in Paris and John Eck in Ingolstadt. Later both became adversaries of Luther and the Lutherans, as did Luther’s former teacher Usingen. The University of Wittenberg did not support the via moderna at all. Thomist and Scotist forms of the via antiqua were predominant among its academics, including the later Reformer Andreas Bodenstein of Karlstadt. During his early years as a student in Erfurt, Luther remained largely among the camp of the via moderna. Soon after moving to Wittenberg, Luther developed his criticism of Aristotle and late medieval theology, where his main target was Biel’s theology, especially his doctrine of grace. However, during those years Luther retained much of his early education, including an interpretation of Aristotle in which he adopted several of Ockham’s ideas. During his later years, Luther made use of terminological tools of the via moderna, even when opposing some of its theological positions.
Subject: 614 Theology
611 Philosophy
Peer reviewed: Yes
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: acceptedVersion
Grant number:

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Via_Moderna_preprint_.pdf 201.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record