Sacrificing Isaac : A Kaleidoscopic view

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Helsingin yliopisto, Teologinen tiedekunta fi
dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Faculty of Theology en
dc.contributor Helsingfors universitet, Teologiska fakulteten sv
dc.contributor.author Koivisto, Ilkka
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201710185565
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/225992
dc.description.abstract The sacrificing of Isaac, described in Genesis 22, is one of the most troubling stories in Bible. In that story, Abraham was faced with a moral dilemma and compelled to choose between two bad options: to disobey God or to kill his son. Why was Abraham willing to commit the most horrendous thing one can imagine: killing his own child? Did God really ask Abraham for such a sacrifice, and if yes, did he really expect Abraham to obey? Several attempts to explain Abraham’s behavior as well as God’s command have been made. Most often, Abraham is portrayed as a model of faith. God, on the other hand, is usually seen as ”only testing” Abraham, but not really expecting a sacrifice. Many scholars are questioning these interpretations, though. To some of them, Abraham is no more than a criminal, and God a moral monster. In this study, I am taking an analytical approach to existing literature and commentaries on the sacrificing of Isaac. I am describing, classifying and comparing different attempts to resolve the obvious conflict between divine obedience and morality. Since the command to sacrifice Isaac is often regarded as a divine test, I will also examine, what exactly might have been the focus of that test: faith, obedience, fear or something else? I am also referring to some contemporary crime cases to show that sacrificing a child in God’s name doesn’t belong only to history. Thus, contrary to some Bible commentators who claim that nothing similar could happen today, I will show that some people have used the story of Abraham and Isaac as a justification for their pernicious action. Finally, and as the title of my thesis implies, I will propose a ”kaleidoscopic” approach to the story of sacrificing Isaac. Just like an image in a kaleidoscope is prone to change with each new treatment, so is the interpretation of the story. Even more, the story in Genesis 22 is like a Rorschach test: it allows for the viewer to see what she wants to see, and to project her preconceptions of Abraham and God to the troublesome image. en
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Helsingin yliopisto fi
dc.publisher University of Helsinki en
dc.publisher Helsingfors universitet sv
dc.subject Abraham
dc.subject sacrifice en
dc.subject ethic en
dc.subject divine command en
dc.subject conflict en
dc.title Sacrificing Isaac : A Kaleidoscopic view en
dc.type.ontasot pro gradu -tutkielmat fi
dc.type.ontasot master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot pro gradu-avhandlingar sv
dc.subject.discipline Religion, Conflict and Dialogue en
dc.subject.discipline Religion, Conflict and Dialogue fi
dc.subject.discipline Religion, Conflict and Dialogue sv
dct.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201710185565

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
KoivistoIlkkaProGradu.pdf 540.7Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record