Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Meniere's disease

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/228609

Citation

Manchaiah , V , Pyykko , I , Zou , J , Levo , H & Kentala , E 2017 , ' Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Meniere's disease ' , Patient preference and adherence , vol. 11 , pp. 1851-1857 . https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S142257

Title: Patient-reported benefits from patient organization magazines and Internet-based peer support in Meniere's disease
Author: Manchaiah, Vinaya; Pyykko, Ilmari; Zou, Jing; Levo, Hilla; Kentala, Erna
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutautien klinikka
University of Helsinki, Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutautien klinikka
Date: 2017
Language: eng
Number of pages: 7
Belongs to series: Patient preference and adherence
ISSN: 1177-889X
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/228609
Abstract: Objectives: To facilitate self-help, the Finnish Meniere's Federation (FMF) provides various kinds of support to persons with Meniere's disease (MD), which includes patient magazines (PM) and Internet-based peer support (iPS). The current study aimed to evaluate the benefits reported by MD patients in terms of PM and iPS. Method: The study used a cross-sectional survey design with a mixture of structured and open-ended questions administered online. A sample of 185 patients from the FMF membership database provided complete data. Results: Ninety-two percent of the respondents rated PM as useful, or very useful. The main benefits of PM included: information on the disease and complaints, information about elements of peer support program, patient's experience with useful positive case studies, relevant news on MD, and information of activity of the FMF. Of the 185 persons, 68 reported that they did not have a need for peer support as their disease was either in silent phase or did not cause any annoyance. The main reasons for nonuse were: mild disease, personal reasons, and problems in using. Regarding the benefits of iPS, 75% of recent and 64% of chronic MD patients said that they would benefit from such a program. The main benefits of iPS included: reliable information on the disease and its management, peer support useful for coping with the disease, information about managing MD symptoms, information about managing attitude, and information about therapy. Moreover, the study identified different groups of individuals, which included: nonusers of support from patient organizations, those who used the support but did not feel they benefited, and those who used and also benefited from such programs. Conclusion: The current study results provide some information about the preferences of MD patients regarding different forms of support and could certainly prove helpful while developing wider support strategies.
Subject: Meniere's disease
chronic condition
peer support
self-help
self-management
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
SYMPTOMS
3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
PPA_142257_pati ... zation_magazine_102617.pdf 495.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record