Comparing Three Twentieth-Century Philosophical Antitheodicies

Visa fullständig post



Permalänk

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/229607

Citation

Pihlström , S J 2017 , ' Comparing Three Twentieth-Century Philosophical Antitheodicies ' , Humanities , vol. 6 , no. 4 , 98 . https://doi.org/10.3390/h6040098

Titel: Comparing Three Twentieth-Century Philosophical Antitheodicies
Författare: Pihlström, Sami Johannes
Medarbetare: University of Helsinki, Faculty of Theology
Datum: 2017
Språk: eng
Sidantal: 16
Tillhör serie: Humanities
ISSN: 2076-0787
Permanenta länken (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10138/229607
Abstrakt: This paper compares three twentieth-century examples of antitheodicist thought in the philosophy of religion (and, more generally, ethics): William James’s pragmatism, D.Z. Phillips’s Wittgensteinianism, and Emmanuel Levinas’s post-Holocaust ethical reflection on suffering. It is argued that all three—despite their enormous differences, given that the three thinkers discussed come from distinct philosophical traditions—share the fundamental antitheodicist argument according to which theodicies seeking to justify God’s reasons for allowing the world to contain horrible evil and suffering amount to morally problematic, or even immoral, failures to acknowledge other human beings and their meaningless suffering. Furthermore, it is suggested that this antitheodicist line of thought shared by all three is based on a Kantian transcendental analysis of the necessary conditions for the possibility of occupying a moral perspective on the world.
Subject: 614 Theology
611 Philosophy
Licens:


Filer under denna titel

Totalt antal nerladdningar: Laddar...

Filer Storlek Format Granska
humanities_06_00098_v2.pdf 244.7Kb PDF Granska/Öppna

Detta dokument registreras i samling:

Visa fullständig post