Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake : comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/232173

Citation

Erkkilä , K-M , Ojala , A , Bastviken , D , Biermann , T , Heiskanen , J J , Lindroth , A , Peltola , O , Rantakari , M , Vesala , T & Mammarella , I 2018 , ' Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake : comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method ' , Biogeosciences , vol. 15 , no. 2 , pp. 429-445 . https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-429-2018

Title: Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake : comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method
Author: Erkkilä, Kukka-Maaria; Ojala, Anne; Bastviken, David; Biermann, Tobias; Heiskanen, Jouni J.; Lindroth, Anders; Peltola, Olli; Rantakari, Miitta; Vesala, Timo; Mammarella, Ivan
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)
University of Helsinki, Viikki Plant Science Centre (ViPS)
University of Helsinki, Ecosystem processes (INAR Forest Sciences)
University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)
University of Helsinki, Department of Physics
University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences
University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)
Date: 2018-01-19
Language: eng
Number of pages: 17
Belongs to series: Biogeosciences
ISSN: 1726-4170
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/232173
Abstract: Freshwaters bring a notable contribution to the global carbon budget by emitting both carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) to the atmosphere. Global estimates of freshwater emissions traditionally use a wind-speed-based gas transfer velocity, k CC (introduced by Cole and Caraco, 1998), for calculating diffusive flux with the boundary layer method (BLM). We compared CH4 and CO2 fluxes from BLM with k CC and two other gas transfer velocities (k TE and k HE), which include the effects of water-side cooling to the gas transfer besides shear-induced turbulence, with simultaneous eddy covariance (EC) and floating chamber (FC) fluxes during a 16-day measurement campaign in September 2014 at Lake Kuivajarvi in Finland. The measurements included both lake stratification and water column mixing periods. Results show that BLM fluxes were mainly lower than EC, with the more recent model k TE giving the best fit with EC fluxes, whereas FC measurements resulted in higher fluxes than simultaneous EC measurements. We highly recommend using up-to-date gas transfer models, instead of kCC, for better flux estimates. BLM CO2 flux measurements had clear differences between daytime and night-time fluxes with all gas transfer models during both stratified and mixing periods, whereas EC measurements did not show a diurnal behaviour in CO2 flux. CH4 flux had higher values in daytime than night-time during lake mixing period according to EC measurements, with highest fluxes detected just before sunset. In addition, we found clear differences in daytime and night-time concentration difference between the air and surface water for both CH4 and CO2. This might lead to biased flux estimates, if only daytime values are used in BLM upscaling and flux measurements in general. FC measurements did not detect spatial variation in either CH4 or CO2 flux over Lake Kuivajarvi. EC measurements, on the other hand, did not show any spatial variation in CH4 fluxes but did show a clear difference between CO2 fluxes from shallower and deeper areas. We highlight that while all flux measurement methods have their pros and cons, it is important to carefully think about the chosen method and measurement interval, as well as their effects on the resulting flux.
Subject: WATER-AIR INTERFACES
INLAND WATERS
BOREAL LAKE
GAS FLUXES
EMISSIONS
CO2
EXCHANGE
SURFACE
CYCLE
SUPERSATURATION
1172 Environmental sciences
1171 Geosciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
bg_15_429_2018.pdf 5.073Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record