Emotionally Charged Aesthetic Experience

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Määttänen, Pentti
dc.contributor.editor Scarinzi, Alfonsina
dc.date.accessioned 2018-02-12T14:47:00Z
dc.date.available 2018-02-12T14:47:00Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Määttänen , P 2015 , Emotionally Charged Aesthetic Experience . in A Scarinzi (ed.) , Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind : Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy . Contributions To Phenomenology , vol. 73 , Springer , Dordrecht , pp. 85-99 .
dc.identifier.other PURE: 56022653
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 8da92c3d-0a72-4cf1-a596-80f1b75f122b
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/232315
dc.description.abstract Abstract In traditional aesthetics, the typical characteristic of aesthetic experience is said to be pure disinterested beauty. However, the discussion based on this notion is burdened with the philosophical background assumptions of German idealism. In his Art as Experience John Dewey challenged the classical philosophical tradition and presented the key ideas for developing a new concept of aesthetic experience. In order to understand his pragmatist notion of aesthetic experience it is necessary to discuss a number of topics concerning pragmatist the challenge to classical philosophy. The philosophical naturalism of pragmatism questions the traditional distinction between the changing empirical world and the mind-independent real world as an object of genuine knowledge. There is only one world and we are in it. Dewey’s naturalism is, however, in important respects different from the main trend in contemporary naturalism. Further, the pragmatist conception of experience must be clearly distinguished from the traditional notion of experience as sense experience. Action and practice are modes of experiencing and understanding the world. The third topic concerns the naturalistic denial of any immaterial substances. The mind is necessarily embodied, but this is not enough to remove the classical dichotomy between internal and external. A fourth questionable dichotomy in classical philosophy is related to this: the sharp distinction between reason and experience. The pragmatist notion of meaning undermines this dualism. This notion of meaning also serves as a basis for understanding Dewey’s comments on the meanings typical in art. Finally, the emotionally expressive power of art requires an explanation. A discussion of all these points helps to clarify the character of the pragmatist notion of aesthetic experience developed below. fi
dc.format.extent 15
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Springer
dc.relation.ispartof Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind
dc.relation.ispartofseries Contributions To Phenomenology
dc.relation.isversionof 978-94-017-9378-0
dc.relation.isversionof 978-94-017-9379-7
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject 611 Philosophy
dc.title Emotionally Charged Aesthetic Experience en
dc.type Chapter
dc.contributor.organization Department of Philosophy, History and Art Studies
dc.description.reviewstatus Peer reviewed
dc.relation.issn 0923-9545
dc.rights.accesslevel openAccess
dc.type.version acceptedVersion

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
M_tt_nen_Emotio ... d_Aesthetic_Experience.pdf 562.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record