Policy Implementation and Initiatives in Russia : a Local Perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Aleksanteri Institute 2010-2017 en
dc.contributor.author Sätre, Ann-Mari
dc.contributor.author Granberg, Leo Holger
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-13T11:02:01Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-13T11:02:01Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Sätre , A-M & Granberg , L H 2017 , ' Policy Implementation and Initiatives in Russia : a Local Perspective ' , Laboratorium , vol. 2017 , no. 3 , 3 , pp. 70-81 . https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2017-9-3-70-81 en
dc.identifier.issn 2076-8214
dc.identifier.other PURE: 97456776
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: fc1e723d-d61e-420b-8cf9-c8e2084521f5
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0003-3595-5643/work/42596063
dc.identifier.other WOS: 000432693000004
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/233373
dc.description.abstract This article discusses the role of local initiatives in policy implementation in Russia. The question of the relationship between state and civic organizations in Russia is complex and problematic. On the local level, state programs and private charity funds offer some financing for local projects, realizing local initiatives. Such projects are often consequences of civic activity and would benefit from vital and well-functioning NGOs, which are rare in present-day Russia. This article introduces the main political instruments for local development, and describes the experiences of local initiatives, understanding them as features of an emerging civil society in Russia. It also describes the relation between state and local activity, posing the question: What type of democracy do these local experiences indicate? A “project approach” on the local level can be thought of as an attempt by the Russian power hierarchy to solve local social problems by combining hierarchic decision-making and people’s participation. It leads Russian leaders to the complicated dilemma of supporting active participation while needing to maintain control over it at the same time—in spite of that control’s negative effects on local initiatives and innovation. For local citizens it creates a dilemma: they must adapt their individual agency to the social landscape of support and punishment. Finally, the article revisits March and Olsen’s (1989) two models of democracy, the “aggregative pattern” and the “integrative pattern.” The Russian political practice seems to attempt to adopt limited versions of both models at the same time, even if not in their purest form. The first model, the aggregative pattern, is adopted on the macro level with a strong authoritative element blended within interest mediation, and the integrative pattern is adopted at the local level combined with the construction of controlling mechanisms. en
dc.format.extent 12
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Laboratorium
dc.rights en
dc.subject 517 Political science en
dc.title Policy Implementation and Initiatives in Russia : a Local Perspective en
dc.type Article
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2017-9-3-70-81
dc.type.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.contributor.pbl

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
709_5863_1_PB.pdf 130.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record