On The Dialectics of Global Governance in the Twenty-First Century : A Polanyian Double Movement?

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/233383

Lähdeviite

Patomäki , H O 2015 , On The Dialectics of Global Governance in the Twenty-First Century : A Polanyian Double Movement? in S Brincat (ed.) , Dialectics in World Politics . , 9 , Rethinking Globalizations , vol. 38 , Routledge , Abingdon , pp. 165-182 . < https://www.routledge.com/Dialectics-in-World-Politics/Brincat/p/book/9780415625272 >

Julkaisun nimi: On The Dialectics of Global Governance in the Twenty-First Century : A Polanyian Double Movement?
Tekijä: Patomäki, Heikki Olavi
Muu tekijä: Brincat, Shannon
Tekijän organisaatio: Department of Political and Economic Studies (2010-2017)
Political Science
Julkaisija: Routledge
Päiväys: 2015-06-05
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 18
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Dialectics in World Politics
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Rethinking Globalizations
ISBN: 9780415625272
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/233383
Tiivistelmä: Following decades of economic globalisation and market-oriented reforms across the world, Karl Polanyi’s double movement has been invoked not only to explain what is happening but also to give reasons for being hopeful about a different future. Some have suggested a pendulum model of history: a swing from markets to society leading, in the next phase, to a swing from society to markets, and so on. The double movement can also be understood dialectically as a description of an irreversible historical development following its own inner laws or schemes of development. Going beyond a thesis–antithesis–synthesis pattern, I maintain that conceptions and schemes drawn from dialectics, and especially dialectical critical realism, can provide better geo-historical hypotheses for explaining past changes and for building scenarios about possible future changes. I analyse political economy contradictions and tendencies, and focus on normative rationality, to assess substantial claims about rational tendential directionality of world history. I argue that democratic global Keynesianism would enable processes of decommodification and new syntheses concerning the market/social nexus. A learning process towards qualitatively higher levels of reflexivity can help develop global transformative agency. Existing contradictions can be resolved by means of rational collective actions and building more adequate common institutions. These collective actions are likely to involve new forms of political agency such as world political parties.
Avainsanat: 517 Political science
contradiction, critical realism, market, political economy, scenario, utopia
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: acceptedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
Dialectics_of_g ... y_Final_before_proofs_.pdf 454.3KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot