How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/234086

Citation

Di Gregorio , M , Gallemore , C T , Brockhaus , M , Fatorelli , L & Efrian , M 2017 , ' How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+ ' , Global Environmental Change , vol. 45 , pp. 133–150 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.006

Title: How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+
Author: Di Gregorio, Monica; Gallemore, Caleb Tyrell; Brockhaus, Maria; Fatorelli, Leandra; Efrian, Muharrom
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences
Date: 2017-07
Language: eng
Number of pages: 18
Belongs to series: Global Environmental Change
ISSN: 0959-3780
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/234086
Abstract: This paper investigates the adoption of discourses on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD +) across different national contexts. It draws on institutional theories to develop and test a number of hypotheses on the role of shared beliefs and politico-economic institutions in determining the discursive choices of policy actors. The results show that win win ecological modernization discourse, embraced by powerful government agencies and international actors, dominates national REDD + policy arenas. This discourse is challenged primarily by a minority reformist civic environmentalist discourse put forward primarily by domestic NGOs. We find evidence that countries with a less democratic political system and large-scale primary sector investments facilitate the adoption of reconciliatory ecological modernization discourse, which may not directly challenge the drivers of deforestation. Policy actors who believe in and are engaged in market-based approaches to REDD + are much more likely to adopt ecological modernization discourses, compared to policy actors who work on community development and livelihoods issues.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
Climate change discourse
Institutions
Policy beliefs
Environmental governance
Forest
Mitigation
CLIMATE-CHANGE
DISCURSIVE INSTITUTIONALISM
AVOIDED DEFORESTATION
7 COUNTRIES
GOVERNANCE
POLITICS
POWER
INDONESIA
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
How_institution ... nvironmental_discourse.pdf 532.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record