Explanation by Idealized Theories

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/243081

Lähdeviite

Niiniluoto , I 2018 , ' Explanation by Idealized Theories ' , Kairos , vol. 20 , no. 1 , pp. 43-63 . https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0003

Julkaisun nimi: Explanation by Idealized Theories
Tekijä: Niiniluoto, Ilkka
Päiväys: 2018-06
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 21
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Kairos
ISSN: 1521-2300
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/243081
Tiivistelmä: The use of idealized scientific theories in explanations of empirical facts and regularities is problematic in two ways: they don't satisfy the condition that the explanans is true, and they may fail to entail the explanandum. An attempt to deal with the latter problem was proposed by Hempel and Popper with their notion of approximate explanation. A more systematic perspective on idealized explanations was developed with the method of idealization and concretization by the Poznan school (Nowak, Krajewski) in the 1970s. If idealizational laws are treated as counterfactual conditionals, they can be true or truthlike, and the concretizations of such laws may increase their degree of truthlikeness. By replacing Hempel's truth requirement with the condition that an explanatory theory is truthlike one can distinguish several important types of approximate, corrective, and contrastive explanations by idealized theories. The conclusions have important consequences for the debates about scientific realism and anti-realism.
Avainsanat: 611 Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Tekijänoikeustiedot:


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
_1647659X_Kairo ... _by_Idealized_Theories.pdf 250.5KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot