Browsing by Title

Sort by: Order: Results:

Now showing items 29-48 of 142
  • Haavisto, Ira; Kovacs, Gyöngyi (Gower, 2013)
    Chapter 27
  • Nyman, Linus Morten; Lindman, Juho (Talent First Network, 2013-01-15)
  • Korkeamäki, Timo; Pöyry, Salla Fanny Helena; Suo, Maiju (Elsevier BV * North-Holland, 2014)
  • Gebauer, Heiko; Kowalkowski, Christian (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2012)
    Purpose – The paper aims to provide a better understanding of the interrelatedness of customer and service orientations in the organizational structures of capital goods manufacturing companies. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative, multi-case research design was employed using 36 European capital goods manufacturing companies. Findings – This article explored four different patterns of how companies move from being product-focused to service-focused, and from having an organizational structure that is geographically focused to one that is customer-focused. The four patterns are termed as follows: emphasizing service orientation, service-focused organizational structure, emphasizing customer orientation, and customer-focused organizational structure. Research limitations/implications – Although the study is based on 36 case studies, the external validity (generalizability) of the findings could not be assessed accurately. Practical implications – The description of the four organizational approaches offers guidance for managers to restructure their companies towards service and customer orientations. Originality/value – The article links the relatively independent discussions of service and customer orientations in the context of organizational structures. The four patterns provide a better understanding of how capital goods manufacturers integrate increased customer and service focuses in their organizational structures.
  • Strandvik, Tore; Holmlund, Maria; Edvardsson, Bo (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2012-01-20)
  • Lindman, Juho; Tammisto, Yulia (2012-06-20)
  • Laakso, Mikael; Björk, Bo-Christer (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013)
    Delayed open access (OA) refers to scholarly articles in subscription journals made available openly on the web directly through the publisher at the expiry of a set embargo period. Though a substantial number of journals have practiced delayed OA since they started publishing e-versions, empirical studies concerning open access have often overlooked this body of literature. This study provides comprehensive quantitative measurements by identifying delayed OA journals, collecting data concerning their publication volumes, embargo lengths, and citation rates. Altogether 492 journals were identified, publishing a combined total of 111 312 articles in 2011. 77,8 % of these articles were made open access within 12 months from publication, with 85,4 % becoming available within 24 months. A journal impact factor analysis revealed that delayed OA journals have on average twice as high average citation rates compared to closed subscription journals, and three times as high as immediate OA journals. Overall the results demonstrate that delayed OA journals constitute an important segment of the openly available scholarly journal literature, both by their sheer article volume as well as by including a substantial proportion of high impact journals.
  • Kovacs, Gyöngyi; Matopoulos, Aristides; Hayes, Odran (IGI Global, 2012)
  • Tatham, Peter; Kovacs, Gyöngyi (IGI Global, 2012)
  • Biggemann, Sergio; Kowalkowski, Christian; Maley, Jane; Brege, Staffan (Elsevier Inc., 2013)
  • Fougère, Martin; Moulettes, Agneta (Sage Publications Ltd., 2012-01-31)
  • Strandvik, Tore; Helkkula, Anu (Department of Business Studies. Uppsala University, 2013-10)
  • Editorial 
    Kindström, Daniel; Kowalkowski, Christian (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2014)
  • Välikangas, Liisa (Cambridge University Press, 2015-03-01)
    I am honored to join the MOR editorial team as the editor for Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion. My commitment is to facilitate dialogue, debate, and discussion on management and organization theory that is rooted in practice in emerging economies yet has implications beyond. Let us learn ‘slowly’ (cf. Levinthal & March, 1993) and resist too fast convergence to Western management methods before we have a chance to better understand and assimilate the divergence around the world.
  • Kindström, Daniel; Kowalkowski, Christian; Sandberg, Erik (Elsevier Inc., 2013)
  • Turcotte, Marie-France; Reinecke, Juliane; den Hond, Frank (Walter de Gruyter, 2014)
    Amid concerns for a regulatory void in transnational fields, the principle of private regulation has become institutionalized. Many sectors have seen the emergence of multiple and overlapping standards. When comparing the sectors, there is considerable variation in standard multiplicity. We build on three institutional perspectives that have been put forward to explain the emergence of sustainability standards—the economic, idealist and political-institutional perspectives—to analyze the phenomenon of standard multiplicity. Each perspective reflects a different kind of action logic and is simultaneously present and accessible to various parties involved. Based on a cross-sector analysis of standards multiplicity in the forestry, coffee and textile sectors, this article seeks to make two contributions. First, whereas these three perspectives have been presented as competing, we propose that they are complementary in offering partial explanations for different episodes in the dynamics underlying standards multiplicity in different sectors. Second, whereas most studies have analyzed standard setting in single sectors and thus have understood it as being an intra-sector phenomenon, our cross-sector analysis of the dynamics of standard setting suggests that it is propelled by both sector-specific contingencies and experiences as well as by the experiences from other sectors.
  • Allen, Ann; Kovacs, Gyöngyi; Masini, Andrea; Vaillancourt, Alain; van Wassenhove, Luk (Emerald, 2013)