Doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions : A cross-national study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor University of Helsinki, Department of Education en
dc.contributor.author Sala-Burbaré, Anna
dc.contributor.author Peltonen, Jouni
dc.contributor.author Pyhältö, Kirsi
dc.contributor.author Castelló, Montserrat
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-03T07:20:01Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-03T07:20:01Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Sala-Burbaré , A , Peltonen , J , Pyhältö , K & Castelló , M 2018 , ' Doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions : A cross-national study ' , International Journal of Doctoral Studies , vol. 13 , pp. 327-345 . https://doi.org/10.28945/4103 en
dc.identifier.issn 1556-8881
dc.identifier.other PURE: 119424837
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 318ccf19-5d1f-4cf3-bb0f-438e0ed03eac
dc.identifier.other Scopus: 85055663294
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/269775
dc.description.abstract Aim/Purpose This study aimed to explore individual variation in doctoral candidates’ perceptions about research writing and themselves as writers (research writing perceptions) across three countries (Spain, Finland, and the UK) and the relationship with doctoral candidates’ research conditions and social support. Background The present study employed a person-centered approach to identify profiles among doctoral candidates’ in relation to their research writing perceptions and the association between these profiles and research conditions and experiences (e.g., thesis format, thesis language, enrollment modality, phase of the doctorate, number of publications, and drop-out intentions) and perceived social support from supervisors and research community. Methodology 1,463 doctoral candidates responded to the Doctoral Experience survey. EFA and CFA were used to corroborate the factor structure of the research writing scale. Research writing profiles were identified by employing cluster analysis and compared regarding research conditions and experience and both types of social support. Contribution This study contributes to the literature on doctoral development by providing evidence on the social nature of doctoral candidates’ writing development. It is argued that doctoral candidates’ perceptions of writing are related to transversal factors, such as doctoral candidates’ researcher identity and genre knowledge. It also shows that most candidates still lack opportunities to write and learn to write with and from other researchers. Findings Three writing profiles were identified: Productive, Reduced productivity, and Struggler profiles. Participants in the Productive profile experienced more researcher community and supervisory support and had more publications, Struggler writers reported drop-out intentions more often than participants in the other profiles, and Reduced productivity writers were more likely to not know the format of the thesis. The three profiles presented similar distribution in relation to participants’ country, the language in which they were writing their dissertation, and whether they were participating in a research team. Recommendations for Practitioners Supervisors and doctoral schools need to be aware of difficulties involved in writing at the PhD level for all doctoral candidates, not only for those writing in a second language, and support them in developing transformative research writing perceptions and establishing collaboration with other researchers. Research teams need to reflect on the writing support and opportunities they offer to doctoral candidates in promoting their writing development. Recommendation for Researchers Further studies should take into account that the development of research writing perceptions is a complex process that might be affected by many and diverse factors and vary along the doctoral trajectory]. Future Research Future research could explore the influence of factors such as engagement or research interest on doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions. The field could also benefit from longitudinal studies exploring changes in doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions. en
dc.format.extent 9
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Doctoral Studies
dc.rights en
dc.subject 516 Educational sciences en
dc.subject doctoral candidates en
dc.subject doctoral writing en
dc.subject writing perceptions en
dc.subject SOCIAL SUPPORT en
dc.subject research writing en
dc.subject cross-national study en
dc.title Doctoral candidates’ research writing perceptions : A cross-national study en
dc.type Article
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.28945/4103
dc.type.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.contributor.pbl
dc.contributor.pbl
dc.contributor.pbl

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
IJDSv13p327_345Sala4746.pdf 990.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record