Syntactic and prosodic forms of first names in institutional interaction involving multiple participants
Show simple item record
dc.contributor.author |
Voilmy, Dimitri |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wiklund, Mari |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-01-29T14:04:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-01-29T14:04:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Voilmy , D & Wiklund , M 2013 , ' Syntactic and prosodic forms of first names in institutional interaction involving multiple participants ' , Discours , vol. 2013 , no. 13 . https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.8869 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
PURE: 36395821 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
PURE UUID: 4d000598-db2e-4244-83db-3d36c176a99d |
|
dc.identifier.other |
ORCID: /0000-0002-1257-5341/work/53515605 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/298474 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper examines one aspect of turn-taking organization in institutional interactions: the use of first names and their prosodic marking for next-speaker selection. Institutional interaction is characterized by asymmetrical rights to talk and pre-allocation of action. This involves the restriction of one party to asking questions and the other to responding to them. The analysis focuses on two of these multiparty formal situations: co-present classroom participants and live interactive television broadcast with remote participants. In each context, turn allocation is determined by one party: the teacher or TV host. After asking a question as a sequence-initiating action, the teacher or host designates the next speaker by name. The use of first names is situatedly examined in terms of turn-taking organization and prosodic characteristics. The study examines how the prosodic marking is context-sensitive: do the participants have visual access to each other’s actions and how is a name used to attract attention? This paper analyses the formation and maintaining of a mutual orientation towards a single conversational action: selecting and giving the floor to a co-participant of the conversation in an institutional framework. These detailed descriptions of the sequential order are based on ethnomethodologically-informed conversation analysis. The objective is to compare four “single cases”, preserving the specificities and “whatness” of each excerpt. |
fi |
dc.format.extent |
34 |
|
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Discours |
|
dc.rights |
other |
|
dc.rights.uri |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
|
dc.subject |
6121 Languages |
|
dc.subject |
keskustelunanalyysi |
|
dc.subject |
vuorovaikutuksen tutkimus |
|
dc.subject |
luokkahuoneen vuorovaikutus |
|
dc.subject |
mediavuorovaikutus |
|
dc.subject |
institutionaalinen vuorovaikutus |
|
dc.subject |
prosodia |
|
dc.subject |
intonaatio |
|
dc.title |
Syntactic and prosodic forms of first names in institutional interaction involving multiple participants |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
Etunimien syntaktiset ja prosodiset muodot monenkeskisessä institutionaalisessa vuorovaikutuksessa |
fi |
dc.type |
Article |
|
dc.contributor.organization |
Department of Modern Languages 2010-2017 |
|
dc.description.reviewstatus |
Peer reviewed |
|
dc.relation.doi |
https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.8869 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
1963-1723 |
|
dc.rights.accesslevel |
openAccess |
|
dc.type.version |
publishedVersion |
|
Files in this item
Total number of downloads: Loading...
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Show simple item record