Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299084

Citation

Sen , S , Ahmad , Y , Dehbi , H-M , Howard , J P , Iglesias , J F , Al-Lamee , R , Petraco , R , Nijjer , S , Bhindi , R , Lehman , S , Walters , D , Sapontis , J , Janssens , L , Vrints , C J , Khashaba , A , Laine , M , Van Belle , E , Krackhardt , F , Bojara , W , Going , O , Haerle , T , Indolfi , C , Niccoli , G , Ribichini , F , Tanaka , N , Yokoi , H , Takashima , H , Kikuta , Y , Erglis , A , Vinhas , H , Silva , P C , Baptista , S B , Alghamdi , A , Hellig , F , Koo , B-K , Nam , C-W , Shin , E-S , Doh , J-H , Brugaletta , S , Alegria-Barrero , E , Meuwissen , M , Piek , J J , van Royen , N , Sezer , M , Di Mario , C , Gerber , R T , Malik , I S , Sharp , A S P , Talwar , S , Tang , K , Samady , H , Altman , J , Seto , A H , Singh , J , Jeremias , A , Matsuo , H , Kharbanda , R K , Patel , M R , Serruys , P , Escaned , J & Davies , J E 2019 , ' Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment ' , Journal of the American College of Cardiology , vol. 73 , no. 4 , pp. 444-453 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.070

Title: Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment
Author: Sen, Sayan; Ahmad, Yousif; Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay; Howard, James P.; Iglesias, Juan F.; Al-Lamee, Rasha; Petraco, Ricardo; Nijjer, Sukhjinder; Bhindi, Ravinay; Lehman, Sam; Walters, Darren; Sapontis, James; Janssens, Luc; Vrints, Christiaan J.; Khashaba, Ahmed; Laine, Mika; Van Belle, Eric; Krackhardt, Florian; Bojara, Waldemar; Going, Olaf; Haerle, Tobias; Indolfi, Ciro; Niccoli, Giampaolo; Ribichini, Flavio; Tanaka, Nobuhiro; Yokoi, Hiroyoshi; Takashima, Hiroaki; Kikuta, Yuetsu; Erglis, Andrejs; Vinhas, Hugo; Silva, Pedro Canas; Baptista, Sergio B.; Alghamdi, Ali; Hellig, Farrel; Koo, Bon-Kwon; Nam, Chang-Wook; Shin, Eun-Seok; Doh, Joon-Hyung; Brugaletta, Salvatore; Alegria-Barrero, Eduardo; Meuwissen, Martijin; Piek, Jan J.; van Royen, Niels; Sezer, Murat; Di Mario, Carlo; Gerber, Robert T.; Malik, Iqbal S.; Sharp, Andrew S. P.; Talwar, Suneel; Tang, Kare; Samady, Habib; Altman, John; Seto, Arnold H.; Singh, Jasvindar; Jeremias, Allen; Matsuo, Hitoshi; Kharbanda, Rajesh K.; Patel, Manesh R.; Serruys, Patrick; Escaned, Javier; Davies, Justin E.
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Clinicum
Date: 2019-02-05
Language: eng
Number of pages: 10
Belongs to series: Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 0735-1097
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299084
Abstract: BACKGROUND Physicians are not always comfortable deferring treatment of a stenosis in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery because of the perception that there is a high risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The authors describe, using the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) trial, MACE rates when LAD lesions are deferred, guided by physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve (FFR) or the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of deferring treatment in the LAD using FFR or iFR within the DEFINE-FLAIR trial. METHODS MACE rates at 1 year were compared between groups (iFR and FFR) in patients whose physiological assessment led to LAD lesions being deferred. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization at 1 year. Patients, and staff performing follow-up, were blinded to whether the decision was made with FFR or iFR. Outcomes were adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS A total of 872 patients had lesions deferred in the LAD (421 guided by FFR, 451 guided by iFR). The event rate with iFR was significantly lower than with FFR (2.44% vs. 5.26%; adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.95; p = 0.04). This was driven by significantly lower unplanned revascularization with iFR and numerically lower MI (unplanned revascularization: 2.22% iFR vs. 4.99% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.93; p = 0.03; MI: 0.44% iFR vs. 2.14% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.05 to 1.07; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS iFR-guided deferral appears to be safe for patients with LAD lesions. Patients in whom iFR-guided deferral was performed had statistically significantly lower event rates than those with FFR-guided deferral. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Subject: coronary stenosis
fractional flow reserve
instantaneous wave-free ratio
FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE
WAVE-FREE RATIO
ANGIOPLASTY
DISCORDANCE
SEVERITY
PRESSURE
STENOSES
VELOCITY
3121 Internal medicine
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Clinical_Events ... al_Coronary_Assessment.pdf 510.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record