Familial risks for gallstones in the population of Sweden

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299244

Citation

Hemminki , K , Hemminki , O , Försti , A , Sundquist , K , Sundquist , J & Li , X 2017 , ' Familial risks for gallstones in the population of Sweden ' , BMJ open gastroenterology , vol. 4 , no. 1 , 000188 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000188

Title: Familial risks for gallstones in the population of Sweden
Author: Hemminki, Kari; Hemminki, Otto; Försti, Asta; Sundquist, Kristina; Sundquist, Jan; Li, Xinjun
Contributor organization: Research Programs Unit
Translational Cancer Biology (TCB) Research Programme
Clinicum
Urologian yksikkö
Department of Surgery
Date: 2017-09
Language: eng
Number of pages: 6
Belongs to series: BMJ open gastroenterology
ISSN: 2054-4774
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000188
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/299244
Abstract: Objectives Gallstone disease (cholelithiasis) has a familial component, but detailed data on the modification of familial risk are lacking. Using nationwide hospital and population records, we aimed to determine detailed familial risks for medically diagnosed gallstone disease. Design Subjects were obtained from the Multigeneration Register, which contains family data on the Swedish population, and patients with gallstone disease were identified from the Hospital Discharge Register (1964-2015) and the Outpatient Register (2001-2015). Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as the ratio of observed to expected number of cases. Results Gallstone disease was diagnosed in 660 732 patients, with an overall incidence of 131 per 100 000 person-years. Familial cases accounted for 36.0% of all patients with gallstone disease. Of these, 50.9% had a parental family history (SIR 1.62), 35.1% had a sibling history (SIR 1.75) and 14.0% had a parental+sibling history (SIR 2.58). Among a total of 54 630 affected siblings, 84.4% were sibling pairs (SIR 1.55). However, the remaining 15.6% of the affected siblings constituted the high-risk group of multiple affected siblings and an SIR >10; these persons accounted for 7.7% of all familial cases. The spousal risk was only slightly increased to 1.18. Conclusions Overall, the results point to the underlying genetic causes for the observed familial clustering, which may involve polygenic gene-environmental interactions for most familial cases but high-risk genes in close to 10% of cases. Family histories should be taken into account in the medical setting and used for counselling of at-risk individuals.
Subject: BILE-DUCT STONES
CANCER HISTORY
DISEASE
ENVIRONMENT
VALIDITY
GENETICS
3121 General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by_nc
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
e000188.full.pdf 564.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record