Making sense of maladaptation : Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/301661

Citation

Neset , T-S , Asplund , T , Käyhkö , J & Juhola , S 2019 , ' Making sense of maladaptation : Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives ' , Climatic Change , vol. 153 , no. 1-2 , pp. 107-121 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02391-z

Title: Making sense of maladaptation : Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives
Author: Neset, Tina-Simone; Asplund, Therese; Käyhkö, Janina; Juhola, Sirkku
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Urban Environmental Policy
University of Helsinki, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
Date: 2019-03
Language: eng
Number of pages: 15
Belongs to series: Climatic Change
ISSN: 0165-0009
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/301661
Abstract: The need for climate change adaptation has been widely recognised and examples of successful adaptation are increasingly reported in the literature, but little attention has so far been paid to the potential negative impacts of implemented adaptation measures. As the agricultural sector is implementing measures to adapt to or cope with climatic variability and change, the potential negative consequences of these measures need to be explored in order to avoid increased vulnerability or (unintended) environmental impacts. This paper employs serious gaming and focus group methodology to study how agricultural stakeholders in Sweden and Finland frame and negotiate the unintended negative impacts of adaptation measures. The results of our interactional frame analysis suggest that the participants negotiated the potential maladaptive outcomes depending on: (1) whether they agreed that this was indeed a potential consequence of an adaptation measure, (2) whether they considered this to be a negative outcome, and if so whether it was (3) a negative outcome which they could adapt to, (4) a negative outcome that would make it preferable not to adapt at all (5) negotiable in terms of a trade-off with alternative outcomes. While it may be obvious that adaptation options that increase vulnerability should be avoided, this study illustrates the complex, value based, individual, yet dialogical processes and contextual basis for identifying and assessing maladaptation.
Subject: ADAPTATION
CLIMATE-CHANGE
GOVERNANCE
1172 Environmental sciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Neset2019_Artic ... nseOfMaladaptationNord.pdf 479.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record