Risk frames and multiple ways of knowing : Coping with ambiguity in oil spill risk governance in the Norwegian Barents Sea

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/302004

Citation

Parviainen , T , Lehikoinen , A , Kuikka , S & Haapasaari , P 2019 , ' Risk frames and multiple ways of knowing : Coping with ambiguity in oil spill risk governance in the Norwegian Barents Sea ' , Environmental Science & Policy , vol. 98 , pp. 95-111 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.009

Title: Risk frames and multiple ways of knowing : Coping with ambiguity in oil spill risk governance in the Norwegian Barents Sea
Author: Parviainen, Tuuli; Lehikoinen, Annukka; Kuikka, Sakari; Haapasaari, Päivi
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
University of Helsinki, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
University of Helsinki, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
University of Helsinki, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
Date: 2019-08
Language: eng
Number of pages: 17
Belongs to series: Environmental Science & Policy
ISSN: 1462-9011
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/302004
Abstract: The opening of new areas for offshore drilling in the Arctic is highly controversial. As ice cover in the region is melting at an alarming rate, new areas have been opened for petroleum industry in the Norwegian Barents Sea. Our qualitative analysis examines risks related to the petroleum operations in the newly opened areas and provides insight into the complex and socially constructed nature of the risks. With the use of visual influence diagram- based mental modelling approach, we demonstrate the multiple ways in which the risks are understood and defined. We also analyse the type of knowledge that the risk frames are based on. The influence diagrams present the risk frames in a clear, visual, form. The study indicates that the existing governance framework fails to treat the ambiguity around oil spill risks: the current risk assessments and risk management do not reflect on the multiple ways in which the participants in this study 1) frame the problem situation, 2) how they identify different measures to manage risks, and 3) what are considered as key knowledge needs and knowledge producers by the participants. We suggest that social learning and collaborative knowledge production are needed to move towards developing shared understanding of the problem situation. Finally, we suggest that the rigorous examination and the unveiling of ambiguity may help developing deliberative risk governance measures and moving towards sustainability transformations.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
maritime governance
oil spills
offshore petroleum industry
risk frames
mental models
influence diagrams
knowledge production
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S146290111930022X_main.pdf 14.75Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record