Conflicting Climate Change Frames in a Global Field of Media Discourse

Show full item record

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/303363

Citation

Broadbent , J , Sonnett , J , Botetzagias , I , Carson , M , Carvalho , A , Chien , Y-J , Edling , C , Fisher , D , Giouzepas , G , Haluza-DeLay , R , Hasegawa , K , Hirschi , C , Horta , A , Ikeda , K , Jin , J , Ku , D , Lahsen , M , Lee , H-C , Lin , T-L A , Malang , T , Ollmann , J , Payne , D , Pellissery , S , Price , S , Pulver , S , Sainz , J , Satoh , K , Saunders , C , Schmidt , L , Stoddart , M C J , Swarnakar , P , Tatsumi , T , Tindall , D , Vaughter , P , Wagner , P , Yun , S-J & Zhengyi , S 2016 , ' Conflicting Climate Change Frames in a Global Field of Media Discourse ' Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World , vol. 2 . https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116670660

Title: Conflicting Climate Change Frames in a Global Field of Media Discourse
Author: Broadbent, Jeff; Sonnett, John; Botetzagias, Iosef; Carson, Marcus; Carvalho, Anabela; Chien, Yu-Ju; Edling, Christofer; Fisher, Dana; Giouzepas, Georgios; Haluza-DeLay, Randolph; Hasegawa, Koichi; Hirschi, Christian; Horta, Ana; Ikeda, Kazuhiro; Jin, Jun; Ku, Dowan; Lahsen, Myanna; Lee, Ho-Ching; Lin, Tze-Luen Alan; Malang, Thomas; Ollmann, Jana; Payne, Diane; Pellissery, Sony; Price, Stephan; Pulver, Simone; Sainz, Jaime; Satoh, Keiichi; Saunders, Clare; Schmidt, Luisa; Stoddart, Mark C.J.; Swarnakar, Pradip; Tatsumi, Tomoyuki; Tindall, David; Vaughter, Philip; Wagner, Paul; Yun, Sun-Jin; Zhengyi, Sun
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
Date: 2016-01-01
Number of pages: 17
Belongs to series: Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
ISSN: 2378-0231
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/303363
Abstract: Reducing global emissions will require a global cosmopolitan culture built from detailed attention to conflicting national climate change frames (interpretations) in media discourse. The authors analyze the global field of media climate change discourse using 17 diverse cases and 131 frames. They find four main conflicting dimensions of difference: validity of climate science, scale of ecological risk, scale of climate politics, and support for mitigation policy. These dimensions yield four clusters of cases producing a fractured global field. Positive values on the dimensions show modest association with emissions reductions. Data-mining media research is needed to determine trends in this global field.
Subject: 518 Media and communications
climate change
comparative
cosmopolitan
frame conflicts
global warming
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
2378023116670660.pdf 2.258Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record