Russell on Negative Judgment

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/303907

Citation

Korhonen , A 2018 , ' Russell on Negative Judgment ' , Topoi . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9581-1

Title: Russell on Negative Judgment
Author: Korhonen, Anssi
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy, History and Art Studies
Date: 2018-07-13
Number of pages: 16
Belongs to series: Topoi
ISSN: 0167-7411
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/303907
Abstract: This paper concerns Bertrand Russell’s changing views on negative judgement. ‘Negative judgement’ is considered in the context of three theories of judgement that Russell put forth at different times: (i) a dual relation theory (judgement involves a two-place relation between a subject and a proposition, which is an objective truth or falsehood); (ii) a multiple relation theory (judging relates a subject to a multiplicity of objects); (iii) a psychological theory of judgement (judgment involves a mental content standing in a relation of objective reference to its truth- or false-maker). Four issues are singled out for a more detailed discussion: (i) quality dualism versus quality monism, that is, the question whether judgement comes in two kinds, acceptance and rejection, or whether there is only one judgement-quality (acceptance/assertion); (ii) the structure of negative judging; (iii) the problem of truth-making for negative facts; (iv) the different roles of ‘fact’ in Russell’s theories of truth. What emerges from the discussion is a rough chronology of Russell’s views on negative judgement during the period from 1903 to 1948.
Subject: 611 Philosophy
Rights:
Full text embargoed until: 2019-07-13


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

Embargo on files ends: 2019-07-13

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record