Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/305756

Citation

Kenter , J O , Raymond , C M , van Riper , C J , Azzopardi , E , Brear , M R , Calcagni , F , Christie , I , Christie , M , Fordham , A , Gould , R K , Ives , C D , Hejnowicz , A P , Gunton , R , Horcea-Milcu , A-I , Kendal , D , Kronenberg , J , Massenberg , J R , O’Connor , S , Ravenscroft , N , Rawluk , A , Raymond , I J , Rodríguez-Morales , J & Thankappan , S 2019 , ' Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability ' , Sustainability Science , vol. 14 , no. 5 , pp. 1439-1461 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00726-4

Title: Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability
Author: Kenter, Jasper O.; Raymond, Christopher M.; van Riper, Carena J.; Azzopardi, Elaine; Brear, Michelle R.; Calcagni, Fulvia; Christie, Ian; Christie, Michael; Fordham, Anne; Gould, Rachelle K.; Ives, Christopher D.; Hejnowicz, Adam P.; Gunton, Richard; Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana; Kendal, Dave; Kronenberg, Jakub; Massenberg, Julian R.; O’Connor, Seb; Ravenscroft, Neil; Rawluk, Andrea; Raymond, Ivan J.; Rodríguez-Morales, Jorge; Thankappan, Samarthia
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
University of Helsinki, Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Date: 2019-09
Language: eng
Number of pages: 23
Belongs to series: Sustainability Science
ISSN: 1862-4057
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/305756
Abstract: This paper concludes a special feature of Sustainability Science that explores a broad range of social value theoretical traditions, such as religious studies, social psychology, indigenous knowledge, economics, sociology, and philosophy. We introduce a novel transdisciplinary conceptual framework that revolves around concepts of ‘lenses’ and ‘tensions’ to help navigate value diversity. First, we consider the notion of lenses: perspectives on value and valuation along diverse dimensions that describe what values focus on, how their sociality is envisioned, and what epistemic and procedural assumptions are made. We characterise fourteen of such dimensions. This provides a foundation for exploration of seven areas of tension, between: (1) the values of individuals vs collectives; (2) values as discrete and held vs embedded and constructed; (3) value as static or changeable; (4) valuation as descriptive vs normative and transformative; (5) social vs relational values; (6) different rationalities and their relation to value integration; (7) degrees of acknowledgment of the role of power in navigating value conflicts. In doing so, we embrace the ‘mess’ of diversity, yet also provide a framework to organise this mess and support and encourage active transdisciplinary collaboration. We identify key research areas where such collaborations can be harnessed for sustainability transformation. Here it is crucial to understand how certain social value lenses are privileged over others and build capacity in decision-making for understanding and drawing on multiple value, epistemic and procedural lenses.
Subject: Epistemology
Ecosystem services
Shared values
Environmental values
Interdisciplinarity
Knowledge brokering
Relational values
Nature’s contributions to people
MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Nature's contributions to people
DEEP
DELIBERATIVE MONETARY VALUATION
INTEGRATION
COMMUNITY
SHARED VALUES
FRAMEWORK
RELATIONAL VALUES
SCIENCE
1172 Environmental sciences
5141 Sociology
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Kenter2019_Arti ... essNavigatingDiversi_1.pdf 2.050Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record