Design Methodologies and the Limits of the Engineering-Dominated Conception of Synthetic Biology

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/305993

Citation

Ijäs , T T 2019 , ' Design Methodologies and the Limits of the Engineering-Dominated Conception of Synthetic Biology ' , Acta Biotheoretica , vol. 67 , no. 1 , pp. 1-18 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-018-9338-7

Title: Design Methodologies and the Limits of the Engineering-Dominated Conception of Synthetic Biology
Author: Ijäs, Tero Tapio
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Department of Political and Economic Studies (2010-2017)
Date: 2019-03
Language: eng
Number of pages: 18
Belongs to series: Acta Biotheoretica
ISSN: 0001-5342
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/305993
Abstract: Synthetic biology is described as a new field of biotechnology that models itself on engineering sciences. However, this view of synthetic biology as an engineering field has received criticism, and both biologists and philosophers have argued for a more nuanced and heterogeneous understanding of the field. This paper elaborates the heterogeneity of synthetic biology by clarifying the role of design and the variability of design methodologies in synthetic biology. I focus on two prominent design methodologies: rational design and directed evolution. Rational design resembles the design methodology of traditional engineering sciences. However, it is often replaced and complemented by the more biologically-inspired method of directed evolution, which models itself on natural evolution. These two approaches take philosophically different stances to the design of biological systems. Rational design aims to make biological systems more machine-like, whereas directed evolution utilizes variation and emergent features of living systems. I provide an analysis of the methodological basis of these design approaches, and highlight important methodological differences between them. By analyzing the respective benefits and limitations of these approaches, I argue against the engineering-dominated conception of synthetic biology and its “methodological monism”, where the rational design approach is taken as the default design methodology. Alternative design methodologies, like directed evolution, should be considered as complementary, not competitive, to rational design.
Subject: 611 Philosophy
Synthetic biology
Engineering
Design
Rational design
Directed evolution
Evolution
Context
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Ijas2019_DesignMethodologies_postprint.pdf 234.5Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record