Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/307788

Citation

Falessi , D , Juristo , N , Wohlin , C , Turhan , B , Münch , J , Jedlitschka , A & Oivo , M 2018 , ' Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments ' , Empirical Software Engineering , vol. 23 , no. 1 , pp. 452-489 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3

Title: Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments
Author: Falessi, Davide; Juristo, Natalia; Wohlin, Claes; Turhan, Burak; Münch, Jürgen; Jedlitschka, Andreas; Oivo, Markku
Contributor: University of Helsinki, Software Systems Engineering research group / Jürgen Münch
Date: 2018-02
Language: eng
Number of pages: 38
Belongs to series: Empirical Software Engineering
ISSN: 1382-3256
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/307788
Abstract: [Context] Controlled experiments are an important empirical method to generate and validate theories. Many software engineering experiments are conducted with students. It is often claimed that the use of students as participants in experiments comes at the cost of low external validity while using professionals does not. [Objective] We believe a deeper understanding is needed on the external validity of software engineering experiments conducted with students or with professionals. We aim to gain insight about the pros and cons of using students and professionals in experiments. [Method] We performed an unconventional, focus group approach and a follow-up survey. First, during a session at ISERN 2014, 65 empirical researchers, including the seven authors, argued and discussed the use of students in experiments with an open mind. Afterwards, we revisited the topic and elicited experts' opinions to foster discussions. Then we derived 14 statements and asked the ISERN attendees excluding the authors, to provide their level of agreement with the statements. Finally, we analyzed the researchers' opinions and used the findings to further discuss the statements. [Results] Our survey results showed that, in general, the respondents disagreed with us about the drawbacks of professionals. We, on the contrary, strongly believe that no population (students, professionals, or others) can be deemed better than another in absolute terms. [Conclusion] Using students as participants remains a valid simplification of reality needed in laboratory contexts. It is an effective way to advance software engineering theories and technologies but, like any other aspect of study settings, should be carefully considered during the design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of an experiment. The key is to understand which developer population portion is being represented by the participants in an experiment. Thus, a proposal for describing experimental participants is put forward.
Subject: Experimentation
Threats to validity
Generalization
Subjects of experiments
Participants in experiments
FOCUS GROUPS
113 Computer and information sciences
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
ISERN_on_Students_V2.pdf 602.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record