Urgent lung allocation system in the Scandiatransplant countries

Show full item record




Auråen , H , Schultz , H H L , Hämmäinen , P , Riise , G C , Larsson , H , Hansson , L , Dellgren , G , Perch , M , Geiran , O , Fiane , A E , Iversen , M & Holm , A M 2018 , ' Urgent lung allocation system in the Scandiatransplant countries ' , Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation , vol. 37 , no. 12 , pp. 1403-1409 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.08.002

Title: Urgent lung allocation system in the Scandiatransplant countries
Author: Auråen, Henrik; Schultz, Hans Henrik L.; Hämmäinen, Pekka; Riise, Gerdt C.; Larsson, Hillevi; Hansson, Lennart; Dellgren, Göran; Perch, Michael; Geiran, Odd; Fiane, Arnt E.; Iversen, Martin; Holm, Are Martin
Contributor organization: Department of Surgery
III kirurgian klinikka
HUS Heart and Lung Center
Date: 2018-12
Language: eng
Number of pages: 7
Belongs to series: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
ISSN: 1053-2498
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.08.002
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/308851
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Throughout the world, the scarcity of donor organs makes optimal allocation systems necessary. In the Scandiatransplant countries, organs for lung transplantation are allocated nationally. To ensure shorter wait time for critically ill patients, the Scandiatransplant urgent lung allocation system (ScULAS) was introduced in 2009, giving supranational priority to patients considered urgent. There were no pre-defined criteria for listing a patient as urgent, but each center was granted only 3 urgent calls per year. This study aims to explore the characteristics and outcome of patients listed as urgent, assess changes associated with the implementation of ScULAS, and describe how the system was utilized by the member centers. METHODS: All patients listed for lung transplantation at the 5 Scandiatransplant centers 5 years before and after implementation of ScULAS were included. RESULTS: After implementation, 8.3% of all listed patients received urgent status, of whom 81% were transplanted within 4 weeks. Patients listed as urgent were younger, more commonly had suppurative lung disease, and were more often on life support compared with patients without urgent status. For patients listed as urgent, post-transplant graft survival was inferior at 30 and 90 days. Although there were no pre-defined criteria for urgent listing, the system was not utilized at its maximum. CONCLUSIONS: ScULAS rapidly allocated organs to patients considered urgent. These patients were younger and more often had suppurative lung disease. Patients with urgent status had inferior short-term outcome, plausibly due to the higher proportion on life support before transplantation. (C) 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
Subject: lung
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology
Peer reviewed: Yes
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
1_s2.0_S1053249818315808_main.pdf 679.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record