Predefined Criteria and Interpretative Flexibility in Legal Courts’ Evaluation of Expertise

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/310753

Lähdeviite

Taipale , J 2019 , ' Predefined Criteria and Interpretative Flexibility in Legal Courts’ Evaluation of Expertise ' , Public Understanding of Science , vol. 28 , no. 8 , pp. 883-896 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519881338

Julkaisun nimi: Predefined Criteria and Interpretative Flexibility in Legal Courts’ Evaluation of Expertise
Tekijä: Taipale, Jaakko
Tekijän organisaatio: Sociology
Päiväys: 2019-11-01
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 14
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Public Understanding of Science
ISSN: 0963-6625
DOI-tunniste: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519881338
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/310753
Tiivistelmä: This study examines two different approaches in empirical analysis of judges' evaluation of expertise in court: first, an analyst-based approach that employs predefined normative criteria to measure judges' performance, and second, an actor-based approach that emphasizes interpretative flexibility in judges' evaluation practice. I demonstrate how these different approaches to investigating judges' adjudication lead to differing understandings about judges' abilities to evaluate scientific evidence and testimonial. Although the choice of analytical approach might depend on context and purpose in general, I contend that in assessing judges' competence, an actor-based approach that adequately describes the way in which judges relate to and handle expertise is required to properly understand and explain how judges evaluate expertise. The choice of approach is especially important if the resulting understanding of judges' competence is subsequently used as a basis for making normative and prescriptive claims with potential consequences for trial outcomes.
Avainsanat: 611 Philosophy
5200 Other social sciences
Daubert
DTI
expertise
fMRI
interpretative flexibility
law and science
practice
scientific literacy
traumatic brain injury
SCIENCE
JUDGES
LAW
CREDIBILITY
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Tekijänoikeustiedot: unspecified
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: acceptedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
Taipale_2019_Pr ... se_accepted_manuscript.pdf 82.71KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot