Validation of the Finnish version of the BODY-Q patient-reported outcome instrument among patients who underwent abdominoplasty

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/312888

Citation

Repo , J P , Homsy , P , Uimonen , M M , Roine , R P , Jahkola , T & Popov , P 2019 , ' Validation of the Finnish version of the BODY-Q patient-reported outcome instrument among patients who underwent abdominoplasty ' , Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery , vol. 72 , no. 6 , pp. 933-940 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.02.017

Title: Validation of the Finnish version of the BODY-Q patient-reported outcome instrument among patients who underwent abdominoplasty
Author: Repo, J. P.; Homsy, P.; Uimonen, M. M.; Roine, R. P.; Jahkola, T.; Popov, P.
Contributor: University of Helsinki, University of Helsinki
University of Helsinki, Department of Surgery
Date: 2019-06
Language: eng
Number of pages: 8
Belongs to series: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
ISSN: 1748-6815
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/312888
Abstract: Background: Massive weight loss can notably affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and body image. Yet, no body contouring specific instruments to assess HRQoL and body image after massive weight loss have been validated in Finnish. The BODY-Q includes 26 independently functioning scales and a single checklist that measure appearance, HRQoL, and experience of care. The aim of the present study was to translate and validate a Finnish version of the BODY-Q among patients who underwent abdominoplasty. Methods: The BODY-Q was translated into Finnish using recommended guidelines. Eighty-two patients who underwent abdominoplasty due to massive weight loss were identified from hospital records using procedure codes. A postal survey including the BODY-Q, the 15D, and general health and pain instruments was used. Criterion validity, Cronbach's alpha, and floor and ceiling effects were analyzed. Results: The BODY-Q translated well into Finnish. Fifty-three patients returned the questionnaires (response rate 65%) and were included. All but the Scars subscale correlated significantly with the 15D mean score, thus indicating strong criterion validity against a generic HRQoL tool. The Excess Skin and the Physical Function scales reached the ceiling effect (>15% of maximum points) in our postoperative sample. No floor effects were observed. Internal consistency of the BODY-Q scales was high (Cronbach's alpha range, 0.81-0.95). Conclusions: The Finnish version of the BODY-Q instrument is equivalent in terms of content, accuracy, and comprehensiveness to the original English version. The findings of the present study indicate that the BODY-Q has psychometric properties suitable for assessing outcomes and treatment effectiveness of abdominoplasty. (C) 2019 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subject: Abdominoplasty
BODY-Q
Body
Contouring
Body image
Quality of life
QUALITY-OF-LIFE
CONTOURING SURGERY
BARIATRIC SURGERY
CULTURAL-ADAPTATION
WEIGHT-LOSS
IMAGE
TRANSLATION
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Validation_of_t ... derwent_abdominoplasty.pdf 1004.Kb PDF View/Open
1_s2.0_S1748681519300841_main.pdf 634.9Kb PDF View/Open
1_s2.0_S1748681519300841_main.pdf 1.004Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record