Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/312944

Citation

Meyhoff , T S , Hjortrup , P B , Moller , M H , Wetterslev , J , Lange , T , Kjaer , M-B N , Jonsson , A B , Hjortso , C J S , Cronhjort , M , Laake , J H , Jakob , S M , Nalos , M , Pettilä , V , van der Horst , I , Ostermann , M , Mouncey , P , Rowan , K , Cecconi , M , Ferrer , R , Malbrain , M L N G , Ahlstedt , C , Hoffmann , S , Bestle , M H , Nebrich , L , Russell , L , Vang , M , Rasmussen , M L , Solling , C , Rasmussen , B S , Brochner , A C & Perner , A 2019 , ' Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan ' , Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica , vol. 63 , no. 9 , pp. 1262-1271 . https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13434

Title: Conservative vs liberal fluid therapy in septic shock (CLASSIC) trial-Protocol and statistical analysis plan
Author: Meyhoff, Tine Sylvest; Hjortrup, Peter Buhl; Moller, Morten Hylander; Wetterslev, Jorn; Lange, Theis; Kjaer, Maj-Brit Norregaard; Jonsson, Andreas Bender; Hjortso, Carl Johan Steensen; Cronhjort, Maria; Laake, Jon Henrik; Jakob, Stephan M.; Nalos, Marek; Pettilä, Ville; van der Horst, Iwan; Ostermann, Marlies; Mouncey, Paul; Rowan, Kathy; Cecconi, Maurizio; Ferrer, Ricard; Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.; Ahlstedt, Christian; Hoffmann, Soren; Bestle, Morten Heiberg; Nebrich, Lars; Russell, Lene; Vang, Marianne; Rasmussen, Michael Lindhardt; Solling, Christoffer; Rasmussen, Bodil Steen; Brochner, Anne Craveiro; Perner, Anders
Other contributor: University of Helsinki, HUS Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine




Date: 2019-10
Language: eng
Number of pages: 10
Belongs to series: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 0001-5172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13434
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/312944
Abstract: Introduction Intravenous (IV) fluid is a key intervention in the management of septic shock. The benefits and harms of lower versus higher fluid volumes are unknown and thus clinical equipoise exists. We describe the protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan for the conservative versus liberal approach to fluid therapy of septic shock in the Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial. The aim of the CLASSIC trial is to assess benefits and harms of IV fluid restriction versus standard care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. Methods CLASSIC trial is an investigator-initiated, international, randomised, stratified, and analyst-blinded trial. We will allocate 1554 adult patients with septic shock, who are planned to be or are admitted to an ICU, to IV fluid restriction versus standard care. The primary outcome is mortality at day 90. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse reactions (SARs), days alive at day 90 without life support, days alive and out of the hospital at day 90 and mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and cognitive function at 1 year. We will conduct the statistical analyses according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan, including three interim analyses. For the primary analysis, we will use logistic regression adjusted for the stratification variables comparing the two interventions in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Discussion The CLASSIC trial results will provide important evidence to guide clinicians' choice regarding the IV fluid therapy in adults with septic shock.
Subject: INTENSIVE-CARE
SEPSIS-PROTOCOL
MISSING DATA
RESUSCITATION
MANAGEMENT
MORTALITY
VOLUMES
ADULTS
3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Conservative_ve ... tistical_analysis_plan.pdf 373.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record