Osallistumisen ja samanmielisyyden jännitteisyys keskustelunanalyyttisessa datasessiossa

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/313180

Citation

Stevanovic , T M & Weiste , E H 2018 , ' Osallistumisen ja samanmielisyyden jännitteisyys keskustelunanalyyttisessa datasessiossa ' , Yliopistopedagogiikka , Vuosikerta. 1/2018 . < https://lehti.yliopistopedagogiikka.fi/2018/10/19/osallistumisen-ja-samanmielisyyden-jannitteisyys-keskustelunanalyyttisessa-datasessiossa/ >

Title: Osallistumisen ja samanmielisyyden jännitteisyys keskustelunanalyyttisessa datasessiossa
Author: Stevanovic, Tuire Melisa; Weiste, Elina Hannele
Contributor: Helsingin yliopisto, Sosiologia
Helsingin yliopisto, Suomalais-ugrilainen ja pohjoismainen osasto
Date: 2018-10-19
Language: fin
Belongs to series: Yliopistopedagogiikka
ISSN: 2242-8070
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/313180
Abstract: This paper investigates the tension between collaboration and conflict in conversation-analytic data sessions. In conversation analysis, data sessions are an important part of research practice and they also play a central role in the academic method education. Our data consist of focus group interviews among conversation-analytic experts and novices. The interviews are analysed using a combination of discursive focus group research methodology and conversation analysis. We ask (1) how data session interaction is presented in the participants’ talk and (2) how the participants talk about collaboration and conflict in the focus group interviews. The analysis reveals observable differences in how the experts and novices talked about the data sessions. While the experts emphasized the process of collective meaning making, the novices stressed the recognition of individual contributions. Experts also considered silence as a discreet way of disregarding questionable contributions, whereas novices described silence as the worst possible reaction to a contribution. Our results reflect the dissonance between collective responsibilities and individual needs, typical in collaborative learning. Our research suggests that, in academic method education, the balancing between these needs may be especially challenging in groups of members with different levels of competence.
Subject: 5141 Sosiologia
keskustelunanalyysi
datasessio
fokusryhmähaastattelu
yhteisöllinen oppiminen
erimielisyys
konsensus
Rights:


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Stevanovic_Weis ... den_j_nnitteisyys_2018.pdf 691.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record