Building Authority and Legitimacy in Transnational Climate Change Governance : Evidence from the Governors’ Climate and Forest Task Force

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/317767

Citation

Di Gregorio , M , Massarella , K , Schroeder , H , Brockhaus , M & Pham , T T 2020 , ' Building Authority and Legitimacy in Transnational Climate Change Governance : Evidence from the Governors’ Climate and Forest Task Force ' , Global Environmental Change , vol. 64 , 102126 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102126

Title: Building Authority and Legitimacy in Transnational Climate Change Governance : Evidence from the Governors’ Climate and Forest Task Force
Author: Di Gregorio, Monica; Massarella, Kate; Schroeder, Heike; Brockhaus, Maria; Pham, Thuy Thu
Contributor organization: International Forest Policy
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
Department of Forest Sciences
Date: 2020-09
Language: eng
Number of pages: 9
Belongs to series: Global Environmental Change
ISSN: 0959-3780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102126
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/317767
Abstract: Transnational climate change initiatives have increased in number and relevance within the global climate change regime. Despite being largely welcomed, there are concerns about their ability to deliver ambitious climate action and about their democratic legitimacy. This paper disentangles the nature of both authority and legitimacy of a specific form of transnational networks, transgovernmental networks of subnational governments. It then investigates how a major transgovernmental initiative focusing on tropical forests, the Governors Climate and Forest Task Force, attempts to command authority and to build and maintain its legitimacy. The paper illustrates the particular challenges faced by initiatives formed primarily by jurisdictions from the Global South. Three major trade-offs related to authority and legitimacy dimensions are identified: first, the difficulty of balancing the need for increased representation with performance on ambitious climate goals; second, the need to deliver effectiveness while ensuring transparency of governance processes; and third, the limited ability to leverage formal authority of members to deliver climate action in local jurisdictions, while depending on external funds from the Global North.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
4112 Forestry
Transnational climate change governance
Climate change mitigation
Legitimacy
Authority
Forests
Transgovernmental networks
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE
REGIME COMPLEX
POLICY INNOVATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
STATE
UNFCCC
SYSTEM
PARTICIPATION
ORCHESTRATION
CONSERVATION
Peer reviewed: Yes
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: acceptedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
DiGregorio_et_a ... uscript_postrefereeing.pdf 337.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record