Turning Ideas into Proposals : A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot



Pysyväisosoite

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/317929

Lähdeviite

Ertiö , T-P , Tuominen , P & Rask , M 2019 , Turning Ideas into Proposals : A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki . in P Panagiotopoulos (ed.) , Electronic Participation : ePart 2019 . Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 11686 , Springer , Cham , pp. 15-25 , 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference , Italy , 02/09/2019 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27397-2_2

Julkaisun nimi: Turning Ideas into Proposals : A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki
Tekijä: Ertiö, Titiana-Petra; Tuominen, Pekka; Rask, Mikko
Muu tekijä: Panagiotopoulos, P.
Tekijän organisaatio: Centre for Consumer Society Research
Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies (Urbaria)
Media and Communication Studies
Julkaisija: Springer
Päiväys: 2019-07-26
Kieli: eng
Sivumäärä: 11
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Electronic Participation
Kuuluu julkaisusarjaan: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
ISBN: 978-3-030-27396-5
978-3-030-27397-2
DOI-tunniste: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27397-2_2
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/317929
Tiivistelmä: Balancing between online-offline stages of participatory procedures is a delicate art that may support or hinder the success of participatory democracy. Participatory budgeting (PB), in particular, is generally rooted in online platforms, but as our case study on the City of Helsinki PB trial suggests, face-to-face events are necessary to engage targeted and often less resourceful actors in the process. Based on a longer-term participant observation, covering the PB process from its early to ideation phase to the current stage of proposal development for the final vote, we argue that the process has thus far been successful in blending online-offline components, largely supported by the active support of borough liaisons who have served as navigators between the different stages. From the point of view of co-creation, different stages of the PB process (ideation, co-creation) call for different strategies of online-offline participation. Effective mobilization of marginalized actors and interactions between public servants and citizens seem to benefit from face-to-face processes, while city-wide voting and discussion can effectively occur in the online platform.
Avainsanat: 511 Economics
517 Political science
113 Computer and information sciences
Vertaisarvioitu: Kyllä
Tekijänoikeustiedot: unspecified
Pääsyrajoitteet: openAccess
Rinnakkaistallennettu versio: acceptedVersion


Tiedostot

Latausmäärä yhteensä: Ladataan...

Tiedosto(t) Koko Formaatti Näytä
ePart_v3_submission200519_word.pdf 316.1KB PDF Avaa tiedosto

Viite kuuluu kokoelmiin:

Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot