Chris Brown’s Liberal Conservatism, the Process of Moral Learning and Global Institutional Transformations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Patomäki, Heikki Olavi
dc.contributor.editor Albert, Mathias
dc.contributor.editor Lang, Anthony
dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-13T21:50:47Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-17T18:49:24Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09-15
dc.identifier.citation Patomäki , H O 2018 , Chris Brown’s Liberal Conservatism, the Process of Moral Learning and Global Institutional Transformations . in M Albert & A Lang (eds) , The Politics of International Political Theory : Reflections on the Works of Chris Brown . Palgrave , Basingstoke , pp. 219-240 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93278-1
dc.identifier.other PURE: 115453408
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: a3dbc413-dba8-4ce7-865c-b297d25a6536
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10138/318311
dc.description.abstract In the normative theory of International Relations, the major debate has been between the state-centric view and cosmopolitanism. A quarter of century ago I attempted to deconstruct one round of this debate – between Chris Brown and Mark Hoffman – by showing that the debate is both utopian and has an other-negating character. With the help of epistemological discussions and an analysis of two “case studies”, I built a case for a contextualist and dialogical morality, grounded on the concept of judgement. Interestingly, Brown’s 2010 collection of essays is entitled Practical Judgement in International Political Theory. In this paper I first explore whether similar or analogical deconstruction would anymore be possible. Second, I discuss Brown’s ideas about global civil society, democracy and justice, particularly in light of world-historical developments since the early 1990s and in relation to the development of my own thinking on the topic. While Brown has tried to overcome the dichotomy between the state-centric view and cosmopolitanism, I examine whether the idea of universal ethico-political learning and its cosmopolitan implications might explain the divergence in our practical judgements. I conclude by arguing any area of activities in international relations and world society, from property and contract to nuclear safety and global warming, can be subject to normative debates and potentially democratic politics. Good normative arguments often involve designs for better institutions, but they must be realizable by virtue of being connected to real causal processes. en
dc.format.extent 22
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Palgrave
dc.relation.ispartof The Politics of International Political Theory
dc.relation.isversionof 978-3-319-93277-4
dc.relation.isversionof 978-3-319-93278-1
dc.rights unspecified
dc.rights.uri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject 517 Political science
dc.title Chris Brown’s Liberal Conservatism, the Process of Moral Learning and Global Institutional Transformations en
dc.type Chapter
dc.contributor.organization Academic Disciplines of the Faculty of Social Sciences
dc.contributor.organization Doctoral Programme in Political, Soci­etal and Regional Change
dc.contributor.organization Political Science
dc.description.reviewstatus Peer reviewed
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93278-1
dc.rights.accesslevel openAccess
dc.type.version acceptedVersion

Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Chris_Browns_sk ... _global_reforms_FINAL_.pdf 406.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record