Takes , R P , Halmos , G B , Ridge , J A , Bossi , P , Merkx , M A W , Rinaldo , A , Sanabria , A , Smeele , L E , Mäkitie , A A & Ferlito , A 2020 , ' Value and Quality of Care in Head and Neck Oncology ' , Current oncology reports , vol. 22 , no. 9 , 92 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-00952-5
Title: | Value and Quality of Care in Head and Neck Oncology |
Author: | Takes, Robert P.; Halmos, Gyorgy B.; Ridge, John A.; Bossi, Paolo; Merkx, Matthias A. W.; Rinaldo, Alessandra; Sanabria, Alvaro; Smeele, Ludi E.; Mäkitie, Antti A.; Ferlito, Alfio |
Contributor organization: | HUS Head and Neck Center Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutautien klinikka Helsinki University Hospital Area University of Helsinki |
Date: | 2020-07-10 |
Language: | eng |
Number of pages: | 10 |
Belongs to series: | Current oncology reports |
ISSN: | 1523-3790 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-00952-5 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/319188 |
Abstract: | Purpose of ReviewThe concept of value-based health care (VBHC) was articulated more than a decade ago. However, its clinical implementation remains an on-going process and a particularly demanding one for the domain of head and neck cancer (HNC). These cancers often present with fast growing tumors in functionally and cosmetically sensitive sites and afflict patients with differing circumstances and comorbidity. Moreover, the various treatment modalities and protocols have different effects on functional outcomes. Hence, the interpretation of what constitutes VBHC in head and neck oncology remains challenging.Recent FindingsThis monograph reviews developments in specific aspects of VBHC for HNC patients, including establishment of registries and quality indices (such as infrastructure, process, and outcome indicators). It emphasizes the importance of the multidisciplinary team, "time to treatment intervals," and adherence to guidelines. The discussion addresses major indicators including survival, quality of life and functional outcomes, and adverse events. Also, strengths and weaknesses of nomograms, prognostic and decision models, and variation of care warrant attention.SummaryHealth care professionals, together with patients, must properly define quality and relevant outcomes, both for the individual patient as well as the HNC population. It is essential to capture and organize the relevant data so that they can be analyzed and the results used to improve both outcomes and value. |
Subject: |
Head and neck
Cancer Quality of care Indicators Value-based health care PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETINGS CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT TREATMENT INITIATION INCREASING TIME HOSPITAL VOLUME WAITING-TIMES STANDARD SET CANCER CARE 3122 Cancers 3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology |
Peer reviewed: | Yes |
Rights: | cc_by |
Usage restriction: | openAccess |
Self-archived version: | publishedVersion |
Total number of downloads: Loading...
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
Takes2020_Artic ... QualityOfCareInHeadAnd.pdf | 365.5Kb |
View/ |