Decision-Support Tools Used in the Baltic Sea Area: Performance and End-User Preferences

Show full item record



Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/325222

Citation

Nygård , H , van Beest , F M , Bergqvist , L , Carstensen , J , Gustafsson , B G , Hasler , B , Schumacher , J , Schernewski , G , Sokolov , A , Zandersen , M & Fleming , V 2020 , ' Decision-Support Tools Used in the Baltic Sea Area: Performance and End-User Preferences ' , Environmental Management , vol. 66 , no. 6 , pp. 1024-1038 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01356-8

Title: Decision-Support Tools Used in the Baltic Sea Area: Performance and End-User Preferences
Author: Nygård, Henrik; van Beest, Floris M.; Bergqvist, Lisa; Carstensen, Jacob; Gustafsson, Bo G.; Hasler, Berit; Schumacher, Johanna; Schernewski, Gerald; Sokolov, Alexander; Zandersen, Marianne; Fleming, Vivi
Contributor organization: Marine Ecosystems Research Group
Biological stations
Tvärminne Zoological Station
Date: 2020-12
Language: eng
Number of pages: 15
Belongs to series: Environmental Management
ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01356-8
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/325222
Abstract: Decision-support tools (DSTs) synthesize complex information to assist environmental managers in the decision-making process. Here, we review DSTs applied in the Baltic Sea area, to investigate how well the ecosystem approach is reflected in them, how different environmental problems are covered, and how well the tools meet the needs of the end users. The DSTs were evaluated based on (i) a set of performance criteria, (ii) information on end user preferences, (iii) how end users had been involved in tool development, and (iv) what experiences developers/hosts had on the use of the tools. We found that DSTs frequently addressed management needs related to eutrophication, biodiversity loss, or contaminant pollution. The majority of the DSTs addressed human activities, their pressures, or environmental status changes, but they seldom provided solutions for a complete ecosystem approach. In general, the DSTs were scientifically documented and transparent, but confidence in the outputs was poorly communicated. End user preferences were, apart from the shortcomings in communicating uncertainty, well accounted for in the DSTs. Although end users were commonly consulted during the DST development phase, they were not usually part of the development team. Answers from developers/hosts indicate that DSTs are not applied to their full potential. Deeper involvement of end users in the development phase could potentially increase the value and impact of DSTs. As a way forward, we propose streamlining the outputs of specific DSTs, so that they can be combined to a holistic insight of the consequences of management actions and serve the ecosystem approach in a better manner.
Subject: 1172 Environmental sciences
Marine management
Decision-making
Ecosystem approach
DAPSIWRM
Baltic Sea
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
MARINE
MODEL
INDICATOR
EMISSIONS
ABATEMENT
HABITATS
IMPACTS
SYSTEMS
Peer reviewed: Yes
Rights: cc_by
Usage restriction: openAccess
Self-archived version: publishedVersion


Files in this item

Total number of downloads: Loading...

Files Size Format View
Nyg_rd2020_Arti ... _SupportToolsUsedInThe.pdf 967.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record